TO THE QUESTION OF CHANGE IN UKRAINIAN MENTALITY

Abstract

Introduction. The conceptual confusion in the modern intellectual discourse on understanding the content of mentality is largely determined by the fact that mentality is considered within the set of local history science, and on the other - the lack of an interdisciplinary approach to its comprehension. In spite of this, in today's intellectual discourse the intention to clearly formulate a single conceptual approach to mentality, as formed as a result of the historical development of the way of thinking and the psychological structure of the community, manifested through a set of images and representations, which appear as regulators of behavior as an individual, and social group, form a kind of group "code" that provides the difference of one social group from another. Purpose. The purpose of the article is to analyze the notion of "mentality" and the changes of Ukrainian mentality as a result of ХХth century social transformations. Results. It is emphasized that mentality should not be equated with a mindset that should be considered as generic memory, that is, a system of images, representations that are transmitted as a result of unconscious socialization, and determine the way of thinking, the "picture of the world" and the psychological state of the community. Originality. Taking as a basis the idea of the inextricable connection of the mindset with the collective memory of the community in the article, it is shown that cruel repressions and physical extermination of the most active part of Ukrainian society during the Soviet period were accompanied by stimulation of baldness, immorality and cynicism, which resulted in such traits in the Ukrainian mentality as adaptation, submissiveness, infantilism and mercantilism, which contributed to the establishment of "double morality". At the same time, with the formation of new mental characteristics, the Soviet ideology became a fruitful ground for the further development of anarchism inherent in Ukrainians, which manifested itself in opposition to power structures. Conclusion. Along with the above, it is emphasized that these changes were not of a total character, at least in view of the partial industrialization of agriculture, where the traditional values continued to be retained in secular form.

Authors and Affiliations

Olga BOGOMOLETS, Anna BOGOMOLETS

Keywords

Related Articles

HUMANISTIC POTENTIAL OF EASTERN CHRISTIAN STUDIES

Introduction. The danger of changing of human’s nature, depreciation of her natural life are growing concerning with the development and application of new biotechnologies. Humanity stands before the necessity of forming...

TWO HUMANITIES OF CHARLES WILLIAM MORRIS

Introduction. Contemporary philosophy of science and epistemology reverts to the project of the unified sciences introduced by Rudolf Carnap, Charles William Morris and Otto Neurath in 1930s.It leads to revision of philo...

SOCIAL AND CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION IN REDUCING A DESTRUCTIVE IMPACT OF CORRUPTION IN THE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN UKRAINE

Under the conditions of reforming the modern Ukrainian educational system the main task is to create a qualitatively new system of training highly educated specialists of the postindustrial era, which will meet the deman...

ARCHAISATION OF MODERN CULTURE: ROTATIONS, FORMATS, REPRESENTATIONS

Conditions of destruction of representative systems and global transformations actualize the interest in the ancient layers of culture, which found an expression in the archaism of the cultural space and are engraved in...

The sources of religious fundamentalism in the constructivist model of Shmuel Eisenstadt.

The article analyzes the components of the constructivist models of Shmuel Eisenstadt as they relate to the discovery of the reasons for the appearance of religious fundamentalism. It establishes that religious fundament...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP455638
  • DOI 10.31651/2076-5894-2018-2-3-14
  • Views 90
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Olga BOGOMOLETS, Anna BOGOMOLETS (2018). TO THE QUESTION OF CHANGE IN UKRAINIAN MENTALITY. Вісник Черкаського університетету. Серія Філософія, 1(2), 3-14. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-455638