Trivial Dialetheism and the Logic of Paradox
Journal Title: Logic and Logical Philosophy - Year 2016, Vol 25, Issue 1
Abstract
In this paper we explain that the paraconsistent logic LP (Logic of Paradox) promoted by Graham Priest can only be supported by trivial dialetheists, i.e., those who believe that all sentences are dialetheias.
Authors and Affiliations
Jean-Yves Beziau
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP201712
- DOI 10.12775/LLP.2015.022
- Views 48
- Downloads 0
Sweet SIXTEEN: Automation via Embedding into Classical Higher-Order Logic
An embedding of many-valued logics based on SIXTEEN in classical higher-order logic is presented. SIXTEEN generalizes the four-valued set of truth degrees of Dunn/Belnap’s system to a lattice of sixteen truth degrees wit...
Aristotle's Correspondence Theory of Truth and What Does Not Exist
While nowhere does he use the term to refer to his own theory, Aristotle is often thought to exemplify an early correspondence theory of truth. In the paper, I examine the textual evidence used to support the idea that A...
Partial and paraconsistent three-valued logics
On the sidelines of classical logic, many partial and paraconsistent three-valued logics have been developed. Most of them differ in the notion of logical consequence or in the definition of logical connectives. This art...
Can Başkent (ed.), Perspectives on Interrogative Models of Inquiry, Springer, 2016
Book Reviews: Can Başkent (ed.), Perspectives on Interrogative Models of Inquiry, Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, Volume 8, Springer, 2016, vii + 197 pages, ISBN: 978-3-319-20761-2 (Print), 978-3-319-20762-9 (Online)....
Errata Corrige to “Pragmatic and dialogic interpretation of bi-intuitionism. Part I”
The goal of [3] is to sketch the construction of a syntactic categorical model of the bi-intuitionistic logic of assertions and hypotheses AH, axiomatized in a sequent calculus AH-G1, and to show that such a model has a...