Ukraine in Geopolitics of Leading States during World War I (1914—1918)
Journal Title: Українознавство - Year 2019, Vol 2, Issue 71
Abstract
World War I (1914–1918) drastically changed the global geopolitical structure. A number of previously subdued nations including Ukrainians were enabled to establish independent states. Traditionally, Ukrainian historiography paid much attention to internal political processes of the period, neglecting potential problems of the Ukrainian state in case of possible victory of the Entente, or Central Powers; the place of the Ukrainian problem in the geopolitics of the belligerent states; their vision of Ukraine in future; the reflection of this vision in their real policy towards Ukraine. Therefore, it is important to consider geopolitical plans of the so-called leading states (Russian Empire, Germany, Austro-Hungary, France, and Great Britain) to complete a picture of struggle for national liberation, which finally resulted in restoration of Ukrainian independence. There may be no doubts that the Russian Empire as a member of victorious Entente would have suppressed not only Ukrainian statehood but Ukrainian national aspirations as well. Unlike Poland, Baltic States, Finland, Czechoslovakia, and Yugoslavia, members of the Entente never considered Ukraine as an independent state, or even a federated part of Russia. The Russian victory could have even put an end to the history of Ukraine as a geographical region, and Ukrainians as a separate nation. On the other hand, there was a minor chance for Ukraine to become an independent state through subjection to Germany or Austro-Hungary in case of their triumph. Although history often proved that such initial limited statehood could transform into a real one, German Army operations in Ukraine and restoration of the Central Rada to power provided a chance for the above mentioned elaborations. Even in the presence of German troops, Ukraine had a certain possibility to develop as a fully-fledged sovereign state, and the history of Hetman Skoropadskyi’s regime proved it. However, Germany’s defeat on November 11, 1918 ruined those chances. Ukraine had to defend its independence by fighting numerous enemies advancing on all sides.
Authors and Affiliations
Mykhailo Slobodianiuk
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP626580
- DOI 10.30840/2413-7065.2(71).2019.170672
- Views 144
- Downloads 0
Pseudoscientific Versions of the Origin of Ukrainians and Their Critique by Modern Ukrainian Scientists
The article analyzes pseudoscientific versions of the origin of Ukrainians. Critique of these theories by leading domestic scientists is given. It is noted that these theories are a threat to Ukrainian society because th...
Ukrainian Song Culture: Creative-Synthetic Experience of Melopoetics
The material provides the description of the historical experience of Ukrainian musicians and cultural self-presentation of the Ukrainian community due to the melodic and poetic canvas of the Ukrainian song, analyzes its...
Methods of Systematization and Classification in Ukrainian Folklore Studies (as Exemplified by Dumy Genre)
The article uses the dumy epic genre to demonstrate the application of classification and systematization methods in folklore studies. In fact, the theory and practice of implementation of these methods is connected to t...
German Military Invasion of Ukraine: the Beginning of Phase Three (March 5 — late March 1918)
It was a challenging task for the German Army to force Bolsheviks out of the Left-Bank Ukraine. The operation began on March 5, 1918. The Dnipro River was a formidable defensive line where Bolsheviks attempted to block G...
On the Activity of Bodies of National Self-Government of the Crimean Tatar People in 1919 and the Problem of Dating the Crimean Tatar Revolution
The article discusses the concept of the Crimean Tatar Revolution, which began in 1917; the problem of determining its upper chronological boundary; and the activities of the Crimean Tatar national authorities in 1919. A...