UKRAINIAN REVOLUTION AND STATE FORMATION: ON ISSUE OF THE PERIODIZATION AND CHRONOLOGY OF NATIONAL LIBERATION STRUGGLE OF THE EARLY 20th CENTURY
Journal Title: Київські історичні студії - Year 2018, Vol 6, Issue 1
Abstract
The controversial issue of periodization of the political history of Ukraine at the beginning of the 20th century, including the period of the National liberation struggle and Ukrainian State entities during 1917–1922 is considered. Scientists and experts have not yet reached a consensus not only on determining the place, role and character of the Hetmanate in 1918 in the latest Ukrainian past, but also about the periodization of the Ukrainian political history of the 20th century, defi nition of the term and chronological boundaries of the Ukrainian Revolution and Ukrainian statehood, etc. The issute of the periodization of the National liberation struggle of the Ukrainian people from the beginning of the 20th century, the aspiration and purpose of which was to gain and assert its own statehood, had several main schemes, models and periodizations in the national historiography. However, disputes over defi nitions not only of the chronological framework of this historical path, but also of the interpretations and characteristics of its individual days, periods, and stages are still ongoing in the scientifi c community. It is up to me, that the times from 1917 to 1922 should be defi ned as one of the days of the Ukrainian political history of the 20th century, namely: The Day “National Liberation Struggle and Ukrainian State Formation (1917– 1922 biennium)”. This title was due to historical processes and components, that took place in the specifi ed chronological period, the logic of interrelated events, factors and circumstances, objective signs of fl uidity, similarity and diversity of periods, the identity of the causal eff ects of both internal and external circumstances and infl uences, interconnectedness of cultural, social, ideological and political, and state-evolutionary factors of nation-wide signifi cance, the regularity of the beginning and end of the national-political breakdown, holding otvorchyh eff orts and organized struggle for their own rights to self-determination of Nation-Ukrainian people. It is the author’s conception of the periodization of this era, that would be discussed in this essay.
Authors and Affiliations
Pavlo Hai-Nyzhnyk
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP452974
- DOI 10.28925/2524-0757.2018.1.412
- Views 121
- Downloads 0
ЖІНКИ — ВИКЛАДАЧІ ПЕДАГОГІЧНИХ І МИСТЕЦЬКИХ ВИШІВ КИЄВА У 1920-ті РОКИ
У статті досліджується процес формування у 1920-ті роки корпусу жінок-викладачів у педагогічних і мистецьких вишах Києва — Київському інституті народної освіти, Київському художньому інституті й Київському музично-д...
SEJM CONSTITUTIONS OF 1581 AS THE SOURCE OF THE HISTORY OF PARLIMENTARY SYSTEM ON UKRAINIAN LANDS
The author investigates the constitutions of the Sejm of 1581. After examining current structure of the constitutions, the article uses the main issues and problems which influenced on the Ukrainian voivodeships. The aut...
LESSONS OF THE CENTRAL COUNICUL FOR ETHNOPOLITICAL CONSENSUS IN UKRAINE
The article discusses important component of Ukrainian revolution of 1917–1921 — activities of the Central Council in the case of involvement minorities to the Ukrainian statehood processes. The role of interethnic un...
LATIN AMERICA AS A REGION OF THE CONTRADICTION OF THE USA AND GERMANY INTERESTS DURING THE FIRST WORLD WAR
In the article, the author considers the issues of the collision of interests of the United States of America and Germany in the Latin American region during the First World War. The confrontation had a diplomatic charac...
THE ACTIVITIES OF THE MONUMENT PROTECTIVE AGENCIES IN SHEPETIVKA DISTRICT IN 1920–1930s
The article examines the activities of the Kyiv Regional Inspectorate for the Protection of Cultural and Art Monuments (KRIPC) outside the Kyiv region, in particular in Shepetivka district, and the cooperation of t...