Understanding the components of pharmaceutical expenditure—overview of pharmaceutical policies influencing expenditure across European countries
Journal Title: Generics and Biosimilars Initiative Journal - Year 2013, Vol 2, Issue 4
Abstract
Aim: To explain the components of pharmaceutical expenditure and illustrate the strengths and limitations of this indicator. In particular, we explore policies applied in European countries that affect the price and volume of medicines. Methodology: This paper is based on a presentation held at the European Drug Utilization Research Group (EuroDURG)/International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology (ISPE) meeting in Antwerp, Belgium on 1 December 2011. The aim is to raise awareness of the limitations of pharmaceutical expenditure and explain how to interpret pharmaceutical expenditure data. Updated pharmaceutical policies in European countries are based on surveys by the WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Policies (Vienna, Austria). Results: Pharmaceutical expenditure consists of price and volume components. Prices may be indicated at different levels: key price types are ex-factory price (manufacturer level), pharmacy purchasing price (wholesale), and the pharmacy retail price (pharmacy). Taxes, such as value-added tax, are likely to be added. In the hospital sector, different price types, e.g. official hospital price and actual hospital price, apply. Volume may be expressed in sales units, e.g. standard units; prescriptions, or defined daily doses. Pharmaceutical policies, e.g. reference price system, prescription monitoring, discounts and rebates, influence prices or volume and thus pharmaceutical expenditure. Conclusion: When analysing pharmaceutical expenditure data, our advice is to check which components are included and which markets the data refer to. One particular limitation of total pharmaceutical expenditure data is that they often only cover the out-patient sector.
Authors and Affiliations
Sabine Vogler, Nina Zimmermann, Claudia Habl
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP354722
- DOI 10.5639/gabij.2013.0204.051
- Views 83
- Downloads 0
Biosimilars in oncology: current and future perspectives
Cancer represents a significant, and growing, burden on healthcare systems. This is driven, at least in part, by escalating cancer drug budgets. Loss of patent protection on biopharmaceuticals enables the development and...
Common or distinct INN for biosimilars? Only characteristics of the active substance prior to formulation should be considered
To the Editor: I read with interest the letter of Dr Edward T Maggio which was published in Volume 2/Year 2013/Issue 4 of the Generics and Biosimilars Initiative Journal [1] on the naming issue for biosimilars and trace...
Assessing biosimilarity using the method of generalized pivotal quantities
Introduction: For generic approval of small-molecule (chemical) drug products, US Food and Drug Administration requires evidence of equivalence in average bioavailability from bioavailability and bioequivalence studies....
Access to liposomal generic formulations: beyond AmBisome and Doxil/Caelyx
The lack of clear regulatory guidance remains a key bottleneck for securing a second quality-assured source of liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB), the WHO-recommended drug for visceral leishmaniasis. The approval of the fir...
The case for biosimilars–a payer’s perspective
Biosimilars have the potential for making savings in healthcare costs, and with resource allocation, if competition is permitted at the level of treatment induction.