Университетский курс истории литературы и современность: к проблеме взаимосвязи общей и сравнительной истории литератур

Abstract

The article concerns the modern concepts of general and comparative history of literature, the common points in these disciplines are revealed. It deals with the top methods of literary science as well as their application in courses on the history of literature. The question about the problems of teaching the history of literature, in particular, foreign literature is relevant not only in the light of the modern educational reforms in Russia, but also in terms of the overall crisis of the humanities which is discussed in different countries. Today the problem is not the quality of a literary product or its study, but whether literature exists and whether there is interest in its study. Here even titles of books and articles are speaking: “Farewell, literature”, “What else does philology serve?”, “Why and how to study literature?”, “Why do we need literature at universities?” etc. Nowadays the literary critics redefine the concept of literature, the principles of classifying into the historical-literary periods, the concept of “world literature”, which is the material of common literary history and, finally, the inner structure that can be built as the history of styles and schools, as the history of genres, as the history of masterpieces as well as the history of the mass literature development and so on. But in all its variants it tends to integrate the historical and aesthetic dimensions, identify the common elements in the development of national literatures.

Authors and Affiliations

Н. Т. Пахсарьян

Keywords

Related Articles

«Как я носил вас как бы на орлиных крыльях, и принес вас к себе…»: о жанровой природе «Орлиных душ» В.Я. Ерошенко и о влиянии протестантизма на становление образования слепых (статья первая)

In the article a genre of the V.Y. Eroshenko’s text “Washi-no kokoro” (“Eagle Souls”, 1921) was firstly defined – it’s a retelling of the Baptist sermon. It allowed to make a real comment to his letters from British Indi...

Причинно-наслідковий зв'язок структурно-семантичних особливостей оказіоналізмів у мові періодичних видань кінця ХХ століття

Occasional language periodicals in the late twentieth century cover almost all parts of speech. Studies show that the largest group is comprised by nouns. The advantage of nouns among other neoplasm can be explained by p...

Классификация традиционных стилей в классической персоязычной поэзии

The paper considers the classification of traditional styles in the classical Persian poetry. The Medieval Persian classical poetry has come through long period of development and has been spread in a large geographical...

Дилемма истории и литературы в ходе литературного процесса и ее решение в творчестве Орхана Памука

Orhan Pamuk, the representative of the modern Turkish literature, from his teen years was deeply interested in the history of the Great Ottoman Empire and got know a lot in this field, which was expressed in his works. A...

Формування наукової терміносистеми як результат стихійного нагромадження термінного матеріалу (на матеріалі української електроенергетичної термінології

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the organic accumulation stage of UETS terminological material and to lay the foundation for new terminology. In order to achieve this method, we researched and outlined timelines...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP501201
  • DOI 10.32342/2523-4463-2016-0-12-25-31
  • Views 125
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Н. Т. Пахсарьян (2016). Университетский курс истории литературы и современность: к проблеме взаимосвязи общей и сравнительной истории литератур. Вісник Університету імені Альфреда Нобеля. Серія "Філологічні науки", 2(12), 25-31. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-501201