UPAYA PERLINDUNGAN KEPADA PIHAK BANK AKIBAT ADANYA PENGALIHAN OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA YANG DIALIHKAN OLEH PIHAK NASABAH TANPA ADANYA PERSETUJUAN TERLEBIH DAHULU DARI PIHAK BANK (Studi Kasus di PT. Bank Negara Indonesia, Malang)

Journal Title: Diversi Jurnal Hukum - Year 2016, Vol 2, Issue 1

Abstract

The effort to provide a form of protection to the bank, as the creditor as a result of the transfer of an object fiduciary be transferred by the customer, without prior approval from the bank, by performing the consultation, carried out between the banks, as lenders, with the customers of the bank, as the debtor in question. Second, by making the extension of payment period, and the third by selling the lease object or execution under hand relating to the transfer of fiduciary security object, according to the agreement made between each of the parties that are in agreement. While the supporting factors and obstacles in providing protection form to the bank, as the lender, due to the transfer of an object fiduciary be transferred by the customer, as the debtor, without their prior consent, on the part of banks, which in this case the Bank countries Indonesia Branch Malang, for supporting factors, the first is to do a fiduciary guarantee registration, the second is the provision of the right of preference to the bank, as the creditor in Bank Negara Indonesia Branch Malang. As for the inhibiting factors, the first is because it is not regulated period fiduciary warranty deed registration, Second, potential conflict because there is no period of registration. The third is for fee and registration deed notarill very expensive. The existence of a fourth for Fiduciary office in the capital of the province is complicate the implementation of Fiduciary registration, because not all provinces have adequate transportation so there are benefits in terms of practicality. And the fifth for insurance and appraisal costs are prohibitively expensive. The purpose of this study is to provide solutions and to be able to provide and resolve cases related to the transfer of an object fiduciary be transferred by the customer, as the debtor, without their prior consent, on the part of banks, which in this case the Bank Negara Indonesia Branch Malang.

Authors and Affiliations

David Novan Setiawan

Keywords

Related Articles

ANALISA YURIDIS PUTUSAN PERKARA NOMOR 04/PDT.G/2007/PN.PSB TENTANG PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH POLRI

Pemberitaan tentang polisi yang melakukan penembakan sering menjadi perhatian publik, terlebih terhadap polisi yang salah tembak. Tidak sedikit polisi yang kemudian diperiksa, ditindak dan diajukan ke sidang pengadilan a...

KAJIAN YURIDIS PENGESAMPINGAN PASAL 1266 DAN PASAL 1267 KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PERDATA SEBAGAI SYARAT BATAL DALAM PERJANJIAN KREDIT PERBANKAN

Banks in the credit agreement using more standardized credit agreements, the use of standard contracts in the banking credit agreement is based on 2 (two) things, (1) The existence of unbalanced position (bargaining posi...

KAJIAN YURIDIS TENTANG KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN PENDAPAT AHLI DALAM PROSES PEMERIKSAAN PIDANA (Studi Putusan Nomor : 863 / Pid. B / 2015 / PN Dps)

Pembuktian tentang benar tidaknya terdakwa melakukan perbuatan yang didakwakan terhadap seseorang merupakan bagian terpenting dalam hukum acara pidana. Berkaitan dengan pembuktian maka saksi adalah orang yang mengetahui...

POLITIK HUKUM PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK BERBASIS AGAMA DI INDONESIA

The Constitution and other legislation have guaranteed the upholding of religious freedom, but there are still acts of violation of religious freedom that lead to conflicts that are often found in Indonesia, whether the...

TINJAUAN HUKUM PIDANA ISLAM TERHADAP PASAL 6-19 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 15 TAHUN 2003 TENTANG PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA TERORISME

The violations of Terrorism foreseen by Act 15 of 2003 is all acts that contain the elements offenses which are in the legislation. Criminal elements contained in chapter III is quite diverse, but the author classifies c...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP351966
  • DOI -
  • Views 56
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

David Novan Setiawan (2016). UPAYA PERLINDUNGAN KEPADA PIHAK BANK AKIBAT ADANYA PENGALIHAN OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA YANG DIALIHKAN OLEH PIHAK NASABAH TANPA ADANYA PERSETUJUAN TERLEBIH DAHULU DARI PIHAK BANK (Studi Kasus di PT. Bank Negara Indonesia, Malang). Diversi Jurnal Hukum, 2(1), 353-362. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-351966