Urban Ecological Compensation Through Water Resource Ecological Footprint

Journal Title: Opportunities and Challenges in Sustainability - Year 2024, Vol 3, Issue 3

Abstract

To accelerate the exchange of water rights between regions and address the uneven costs of water resource ecological protection among different districts in urban areas, it is essential to make an analysis of regional water resource ecological compensation responsibilities. Establishing a rational standard for ecological compensation based on water resources remains a key method for quantifying the ecological value of water resources. In this study, all districts within a national central city in southwestern China were divided into four functional zones as the research subjects. The water resource ecological footprint method was employed to calculate the water ecological footprint of each zone. The ecological carrying capacity was utilized as the benchmark to determine the water resource ecological deficit or surplus, and the corresponding ecological monetary value of water resources was estimated. The results indicated that the city, as a whole, exhibited a water resource ecological surplus, with a monetary value of 5.088 billion CNY. The western zone, a key urban development area, recorded the highest water resource ecological footprint and the largest ecological deficit. In contrast, the northeastern zone, abundant in water resources, presented the highest water resource ecological surplus, with a monetary value of 9.196 billion CNY. Compensation amounts for the central-eastern and western zones were calculated as 4.169 billion and 7.661 billion CNY, respectively. These findings align with the local water resources' sustainable utilization conditions. The relationship between regional economic development, water conservation, and sustainable development was further analyzed in this study, proposing a water resource ecological compensation model with certain districts and counties as beneficiaries.

Authors and Affiliations

Lin Shi, Tiantian Li, Yao Meng

Keywords

Related Articles

Digital Transformation and Risk Mitigation in Emerging Insurance Markets: A Comparative Analysis Between China and Serbia

Recent trends indicate a deceleration in the growth of insurance markets in developed countries, whereas emerging insurance markets, predominantly in Southeast Asia, and led by China, demonstrate a remarkable increase in...

Investigating the Impacts of Trade Openness and Energy Consumption on Environmental Quality in Azerbaijan: An Analysis under the Load Capacity Curve Hypothesis

Utilizing the load capacity curve (LCC) hypothesis within an autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model framework, this study investigates the implications of trade openness (TO), renewable energy consumption (REC), and...

Advancing Sustainable Development in the Hindu-Kush-Himalaya Region Through Certification Strategies

This study investigates the potential of certification as a driving force for sustainable development in the Hindu-Kush-Himalaya (HKH) region, characterized by its unique high-altitude ecosystems, rich biodiversity, and...

Environmental Regulation, Technological Progress and Carbon Emission Efficiency: An Empirical Analysis Based on Panel Data of Chinese Provinces

China faces the key issue of improving the efficiency of carbon emissions, in its endeavor of building a low-carbon economy and reducing carbon emissions. This paper adopts the super-slack-based measure (SBM) model with...

Addressing Transformative Education and Governance Through the Sustainable Development Goal 4: A Case Study

The United Nations 2030 Agenda designed the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) which were adopted in 2015 with the primary aim of achieving sustainable development by 2030. One of these goals is SDG 4, which aims to...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP752308
  • DOI https://doi.org/10.56578/ocs030302
  • Views 27
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Lin Shi, Tiantian Li, Yao Meng (2024). Urban Ecological Compensation Through Water Resource Ecological Footprint. Opportunities and Challenges in Sustainability, 3(3), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-752308