Use of Multi-Response Format Test in the Assessment of Medical Students' Critical Thinking Ability
Journal Title: Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research - Year 2017, Vol 11, Issue 9
Abstract
Introduction: To evaluate students critical thinking skills effectively, change in assessment practices is must. The assessment of a student’s ability to think critically is a constant challenge, and yet there is considerable debate on the best assessment method. There is evidence that the intrinsic nature of open and closed-ended response questions is to measure separate cognitive abilities. Aim: To assess critical thinking ability of medical students by using multi-response format of assessment. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on a group of 159 undergraduate third-year medical students. All the participants completed the California Critical Thinking Skills Test (CCTST) consisting of 34 multiple-choice questions to measure general critical thinking skills and a researcherdeveloped test that combines open and closed-ended questions. A researcher-developed 48-question exam, consisting of 8 shortanswers and 5 essay questions, 19 Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQ), and 16 True-False (TF) questions, was used to measure critical thinking skills. Correlation analyses were performed using Pearson's coefficient to explore the association between the total scores of tests and subtests. Results: One hundred and fifty-nine students participated in this study. The sample comprised 81 females (51%) and 78 males (49%) with an age range of 20±2.8 years (mean 21.2 years). The response rate was 64.1%. A significant positive correlation was found between types of questions and critical thinking scores, of which the correlations of MCQ (r=0.82) and essay questions (r=0.77) were strongest. The significant positive correlations between multi-response format test and CCTST’s subscales were seen in analysis, evaluation, inference and inductive reasoning. Unlike CCTST subscales, multi-response format test have weak correlation with CCTST total score (r=0.45, p=0.06). Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of considering multi-response format test in the assessment of critical thinking abilities of medical students by using both open and closedended response questions.
Authors and Affiliations
MAHBOOBEH KHABAZ MAFINEJAD, SEYYED KAMRAN SOLTANI ARABSHAHI, ALIREZA MONAJEMI, Mohammad JALILI, AKBAR SOLTANI, JAVAD RASOULI
Effect of Yoga on Cardio-Respiratory Health Markers: Physical Fitness Index and Maximum Oxygen Consumption (VO2 Max)
ABSTRACT Introduction: Sedentary lifestyle is one of the major Cardio-vascular risk factor. Although, yoga is used as a mind-body exercise to increase physical fitness, data on effectiveness of long-term training of yoga...
A Morphological and Morphometric Study on Meniscofemoral Ligaments of Knee Joint and its Variations
ABSTRACT Introduction: There are two Meniscofemoral Ligaments (MFLs) in the knee joint, anterior Meniscofemoral Ligament (aMFL) and posterior Meniscofemoral Ligament (pMFL) named according to their position relative to P...
Afghan Refugees and Immigrants Health Status in Iran: A Systematic Review
ABSTRACT Introduction: Iran, as one of the most concentrated destination of immigrants, has hosted around three million Afghan refugees in the recent decades. Due to inappropriate healthcare, and improper life style of A...
Impact of Occupational Lead Exposure on Liver and Kidney Function Tests on Silver Jewellery Workers
ABSTRACT Introduction: In unorganised silver jewellery industry, lead fumes and lead oxide dusts are generated while manufacturing the silver ring and the workers involved in this business are highly exposed to lead. Thi...
A Rare Case Report of Iniencephaly with Anencephaly and its Rare Associated Congenital Malformation
Abstract Iniencephaly is an extremely rare neural tube defect with incidence range from 0.1 to 10 in 10,000. It is diagnosed by a triad of fixed retroflexion of the head, variable degrees of cervical lordosis and dysraph...