Use of Multi-Response Format Test in the Assessment of Medical Students' Critical Thinking Ability
Journal Title: Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research - Year 2017, Vol 11, Issue 9
Abstract
Introduction: To evaluate students critical thinking skills effectively, change in assessment practices is must. The assessment of a student’s ability to think critically is a constant challenge, and yet there is considerable debate on the best assessment method. There is evidence that the intrinsic nature of open and closed-ended response questions is to measure separate cognitive abilities. Aim: To assess critical thinking ability of medical students by using multi-response format of assessment. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on a group of 159 undergraduate third-year medical students. All the participants completed the California Critical Thinking Skills Test (CCTST) consisting of 34 multiple-choice questions to measure general critical thinking skills and a researcherdeveloped test that combines open and closed-ended questions. A researcher-developed 48-question exam, consisting of 8 shortanswers and 5 essay questions, 19 Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQ), and 16 True-False (TF) questions, was used to measure critical thinking skills. Correlation analyses were performed using Pearson's coefficient to explore the association between the total scores of tests and subtests. Results: One hundred and fifty-nine students participated in this study. The sample comprised 81 females (51%) and 78 males (49%) with an age range of 20±2.8 years (mean 21.2 years). The response rate was 64.1%. A significant positive correlation was found between types of questions and critical thinking scores, of which the correlations of MCQ (r=0.82) and essay questions (r=0.77) were strongest. The significant positive correlations between multi-response format test and CCTST’s subscales were seen in analysis, evaluation, inference and inductive reasoning. Unlike CCTST subscales, multi-response format test have weak correlation with CCTST total score (r=0.45, p=0.06). Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of considering multi-response format test in the assessment of critical thinking abilities of medical students by using both open and closedended response questions.
Authors and Affiliations
MAHBOOBEH KHABAZ MAFINEJAD, SEYYED KAMRAN SOLTANI ARABSHAHI, ALIREZA MONAJEMI, Mohammad JALILI, AKBAR SOLTANI, JAVAD RASOULI
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP362971
- DOI 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24884.10607
- Views 60
- Downloads 0
Histological Evaluation of Epithelial Thickness, Microvasculature and Number of Mast Cells in the Gingiva of Smokers and Non-smokers with Chronic Periodontitis
Introduction: Smoking influences the clinical parameters and disease progression in many ways. Increase in the gingival epithelial thickness and alteration in the microvasculature can be associated with decreased clinica...
Mosaicism in 22q11.2 Microdeletion Syndrome
ABSTRACT Introduction: Microdeletion syndrome is characterized by sub-microscopic chromosomal deletion smaller than 5 Million bp (5Mb) and frequently associated with multiple congenital anomalies. Fluorescent In Situ Hyb...
Urinoma Secondary to Posterior Urethral Valve Presenting with Features of Intestinal Obstruction in a Neonate: A Case Report
Urinoma (or perirenal uriniferous pseudo cyst) occurs due to extravasation of urine in the perirenal space. Common causes include traumatic renal injury or an obstruction in the outflow tract as in a posterior urethral v...
Broad Thumb-Hallux Syndrome: A Diagnosis Made on Clinical Findings
Images in Medicine
Minerals in Pregnancy and Lactation: A Review Article
Micronutrients (include vitamins and minerals) are essential for normal function, growth and development. Minerals have important effects on the health of the mother and foetus. But biological mechanisms of minerals are...