Uterine cavity assessment prior to in vitro fertilization: comparison of 3D transvaginal ultrasonography accuracy versus office hysteroscopy

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research - Year 2016, Vol 3, Issue 3

Abstract

Objective: To compare accuracy of 3-D transvaginal sonography (TVS) versus office hysteroscopy (OH) in the evaluation of uterine cavity abnormalities in infertile women undergoing IVF procedures. OH considered as gold standard. Study Design: A prospective observational study. Settings: A tertiary care centre. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective observational study conducted in 667 infertile women who were scheduled for IVF treatment at our department during June 2014 to December 2015. Main outcome measures- The prevalence of abnormal uterine cavity was 11.52% as detected by office hysteroscopy. There was failed hysteroscopy in 7 women due to cervical stenosis. 3D TVS and OH findings were normal in 631 (95.61%) and 584 (88.48%) women and abnormal in 29 (4.39%) and 76(11.52%) women respectively. This difference is statistically significant with p-value < 0.01. False positive and false negative results for 3 D TVS are 16(2.74%) and 63(82.89%). Considering OH as gold standard, 3 D TVS has 17.11% sensitivity, 97.26% specificity, 44.83% positive predictive value and 90.02% negative predictive value. Conclusion: Uterine cavity abnormalities are considered to have a negative impact on the embryo implantation rates in IVF. OH should be considered as the primary modality to assess uterine cavity in IVF as it can be done without anesthesia and gives accurate diagnosis. Though 3 D TVS is easier, cost effective, non-invasive and have no complications as compared to OH but due to its low sensitivity (17.11%), low PPV (44.83%) and high false negative (82.89%) results, it has a limited role in IVF.

Authors and Affiliations

Vineet V. Mishra, Preeti A. Goyal, Raveendra P. Gondhali, Rohina S. Aggrawal, Sumesh D. Choudhary, Sakshi S. Nanda, Tanvir Tanvir

Keywords

Related Articles

Reproductive outcome following hysteroscopic septal resection

Introduction: Uterine septum is one of the commonest congenital malformations observed in patients with poor obstetric outcome. The incidence could be as high as 80%-90%. The aim of our study is to found out the reproduc...

Abnormal uterine bleeding: A study of its clinical spectrum and incidence of histopathological patterns of endometrium as a function of age with parity

Introduction Abnormal uterine bleeding AUB is a common complaint affecting majority of pre and postmenopausal women Endometirum is a dynamic tissue and is affected by a wide range of histopathological lesions The causes...

HIV infection and hepatic enzymes abnormalities: A hospital based study among the HIV infected women of India

Introduction Globally HIV infection has become a serious public health problems as it is responsible for millions of deaths every year and the women are the most vulnerable to HIV infection in the developing and underdev...

Evaluation of Umbilical Cord Coiling Index in late second trimester and its association with Perinatal Outcome

Background: Umbilical cord plays a major role for foetal persistence during the intrauterine period. Reports had shown that abnormal umbilical cord coiling in the form of hypo or hypercoiling are associated with abnormal...

Synchronous occurrence of two primary gynaecological tumors: A case report

Synchronous occurrence of two primary tumors is rare Endometrial and ovarian cancers are the most frequently simultaneously occurring primary tumors Here we are presenting similar rare presentation of 40 years old lady w...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP241679
  • DOI -
  • Views 72
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Vineet V. Mishra, Preeti A. Goyal, Raveendra P. Gondhali, Rohina S. Aggrawal, Sumesh D. Choudhary, Sakshi S. Nanda, Tanvir Tanvir (2016). Uterine cavity assessment prior to in vitro fertilization: comparison of 3D transvaginal ultrasonography accuracy versus office hysteroscopy. Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research, 3(3), 270-273. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-241679