Validity and Reliability of the Clinical Competency Evaluation Instrument for Use among Physiotherapy Students Pilot study

Journal Title: Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal - Year 2015, Vol 15, Issue 2

Abstract

Objectives: Te aim of this study was to determine the content validity, internal consistency, testretest reliability and inter-rater reliability of the Clinical Competency Evaluation Instrument (CCEVI) in assessing the clinical performance of physiotherapy students. Methods: Tis study was carried out between June and September 2013 at University Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. A panel of 10 experts were identifed to establish content validity by evaluating and rating each of the items used in the CCEVI with regards to their relevance in measuring students’ clinical competency. A total of 50 UKM undergraduate physiotherapy students were assessed throughout their clinical placement to determine the construct validity of these items. Te instrument’s reliability was determined through a cross-sectional study involving a clinical performance assessment of 14 fnal-year undergraduate physiotherapy students. Results: Te content validity index of the entire CCEVI was 0.91, while the proportion of agreement on the content validity indices ranged from 0.83–1.00. Te CCEVI construct validity was established with factor loading of ≥0.6, while internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) overall was 0.97. Test-retest reliability of the CCEVI was confrmed with a Pearson’s correlation range of 0.91–0.97 and an intraclass coefcient correlation range of 0.95–0.98. Inter-rater reliability of the CCEVI domains ranged from 0.59 to 0.97 on initial and subsequent assessments. Conclusion: Tis pilot study confrmed the content validity of the CCEVI. It showed high internal consistency, thereby providing evidence that the CCEVI has moderate to excellent inter-rater reliability. However, additional refnement in the wording of the CCEVI items, particularly in the domains of safety and documentation, is recommended to further improve the validity and reliability of the instrument.

Authors and Affiliations

Zailani Muhamad| Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ayiesah Ramli| Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Salleh Amat| Department of Education & Community Wellbeing, Faculty of Education, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Keywords

Related Articles

The ‘5R + R’ Rule: A simple and comprehensive method for diagnosis of actinic keratosis

Dear Editor, Actinic keratoses (AKs) or ‘solar keratoses’ are cutaneous lesions that arise on areas of the skin that are chronically exposed to ultraviolet (UV) radiation [Figure 1]. AKs are considered early manifestat...

Comparison of Salivary pH, Buffering Capacity and Alkaline Phosphatase in Smokers and Healthy Non-Smokers Retrospective cohort study

Objectives: Saliva contains alkaline phosphatase (ALP)—a key intracellular enzyme related to destructive processes and cellular damage—and has buffering capacity (BC) against acids due to the presence of bicarbona...

Measurement of Impairment among Children with Attention Defcit Hyperactivity Disorder as Part of Evaluating Treatment Outcome

Tis study assesses the impairment and treatment outcome of children with attention defcit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in an outpatient child psychiatry clinic, using multiple sources, including the Children Global As...

Major Advances in the Treatment of Cancer What does a Non-Oncologist need to know?

Te last few years have seen major advances in the management of cancers. Since it is not possible for the non-oncologist to keep abreast with the latest developments in the field of oncology, this review summarises the m...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP14567
  • DOI -
  • Views 350
  • Downloads 13

How To Cite

Zailani Muhamad, Ayiesah Ramli, Salleh Amat (2015). Validity and Reliability of the Clinical Competency Evaluation Instrument for Use among Physiotherapy Students Pilot study. Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal, 15(2), 266-274. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-14567