Validity and Reliability of the Glaucoma Knowledge Level Questionnaire

Journal Title: TÜRK OFTALMOLOJİ DERGİSİ - Year 2018, Vol 48, Issue 3

Abstract

Objectives: The present study was conducted to develop an instrument for measuring adults’ glaucoma knowledge levels and to establish the instrument’s validity and reliability. Materials and Methods: The study group consisted of 811 persons aged 40-80 years who presented to primary health care institutions and did not have a glaucoma diagnosis. A 27-item questionnaire measuring level of glaucoma knowledge was created by the study team. Following expert consultation, it was structurally evaluated. The difficulty index and discrimination index were calculated for each item. Factor analysis was used to determine construct validity, Cronbach’s alpha internal consistency coefficient and item-total correlations were calculated to determine reliability. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess the extent to which the factor structure of the scale fit. We analysed correlation with the National Eye Health Education Program (NEHEP) Eye-Q scale in order to evaluate the validity of the scale. Results: The final glaucoma knowledge level questionnaire comprised 10 items in one dimension. The discrimination index and difficulty index ranged between 0.28 to 0.65 and 33 to 61%, respectively. According to factor analysis, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin score was 0.760 and Bartlett’s test indicated p<0.001. Confirmatory factor analysis showed acceptable scale fit and fit indices. Validity assessment revealed a positive correlation between the total score of the items of the NEHEP scale and glaucoma knowledge level questionnaire score (r=0.522; p<0.001). Scores were higher in participants who were aged 40-64, living in the city, had education level of high school or above and had previous eye examination or intraocular pressure measurement. Conclusion: The glaucoma knowledge level questionnaire has the distinction of being the first valid and reliable scale for assessing level of glaucoma knowledge in Turkey.

Authors and Affiliations

Zeynep Demirtaş, Gökçe Dağtekin, Muhammed Fatih Önsüz, Aziz Soysal, Nilgün Yıldırım, Selma Metintaş

Keywords

Related Articles

Demographic Characteristics and Clinical Outcome of Work-related Open Globe Injuries in the Most Industrialised Region of Turkey

Objectives: To evaluate demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes of work-related open globe injuries in the most industrialized region of Turkey. Materials and Methods: The demographic and medical records of pat...

Limbal Kök Hücre Yetmezliği ve Tedavisinde Kök Hücre Nakli

Görme fonksiyonunun iyi olabilmesinin ilk koşulu, korneanın saydam olmasıdır. Korneanın saydam olabilmesi için ise diferansiyasyonunu tamamlamış yüzeyel hücrelerin dökülmesi ile sürekli yenilenen epitel tabakasının düzen...

Dirençli Diyabetik Maküla Ödeminde İntravitreal Deksametazon İmplant Sonuçlarımız

Amaç: Dirençli diyabetik maküla ödemi tedavisinde intravitreal deksametazon (OZURDEX®; Allergan, Inc, Irvine, CA) implant tedavisinin etkinliğini ve güvenilirliğini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Dirençli diyabetik...

Aynı Aileden X’e Bağlı Juvenil Retinoskizisli Üç Olguda Spektral-Domain Optik Koherens Tomografi Bulgularının Değerlendirilmesi

X’e bağlı juvenil retinoskizis (XBRS), nörosensöriyal retinanın tabakalara ayrılması ile karakterli, X’e bağlı resesif geçiş gösteren bir retina distrofisidir. Hastaların fundus muayenelerinde sıklıkla makülada foveal ki...

Periorbital Emphysema After Endoscopic Nasal Polyp Surgery

Periorbital and subcutaneous emphysema after transnasal endoscopic surgery are rare. Periorbital emphysema has been reported after facial trauma, dental interventions, procedures such as endoscopic sinus surgery and rhin...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP382147
  • DOI 10.4274/tjo.26576
  • Views 95
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Zeynep Demirtaş, Gökçe Dağtekin, Muhammed Fatih Önsüz, Aziz Soysal, Nilgün Yıldırım, Selma Metintaş (2018). Validity and Reliability of the Glaucoma Knowledge Level Questionnaire. TÜRK OFTALMOLOJİ DERGİSİ, 48(3), 115-121. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-382147