W sprawie powoływania członków Krajowej Rady Sądownictwa

Journal Title: PRZEGLĄD SEJMOWY - Year 2018, Vol 145, Issue 2

Abstract

The opinion refers to two problems: Can a judge delegated to the Ministry of Justice be a member of the National Council of the Judiciary? Can a retired judge be a member of the National Council of the Judiciary? As regards the first issue, the author points to the fact that a judge delegated to the Ministry of Justice is still a judge, although s/he does not pass judgments, and the act on the National Council of the Judiciary does not condition the admissibility to run for the position of its member thereon, but on having the status of a judge. Hence, a judge delegated to the Ministry of Justice may be a candidate to the National Council of the Judiciary. As regards retired judges, they may not be candidates to the National Council of the Judiciary, as they do not hold offices (are not in service); retirement results primarily in the removal of the judicial power, as well as particular corporate rights and obligations. The jurisprudence of both the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Tribunal defines the essence of retirement, recognizing a retired person as “inactive” in the sphere of the holding an office. It is emphasized in the literature that judges nominated to the National Council of the Judiciary must be elected “from among judges”. It stems therefrom that they must be persons holding positions of a judge within a given category of courts and that nominating a retired judge is inadmissible. In addition, as regards members of the Council who retire or are moved into retirement during the term, their mandates expire before the end of the term, which manifests the legislator’s will for the positions of members of the National Council of the Judiciary not to be fi lled by retired judges.

Authors and Affiliations

Joanna M. Karolczak

Keywords

Related Articles

Naczelność Najwyższej Izby Kontroli

The Constitution provides that the Supreme Audit Office (NIK) is the primary state audit institution. The profoundness of its “primacy” still awaits to be discovered. Legal scholars have not yet examined the meaning and...

Trybunał Konstytucyjny w sporze z prezydentem, rządem i parlamentem w 2015 r.

Analyzed herein is the Constitutional Tribunal’s judgment of 3 December 2015 (ref. no. K 34/15). The Tribunal considered the issue of consistence with the Constitution of provisions of the act on the Constitutional Tribu...

Funkcja sygnalizacyjna Trybunału Konstytucyjnego — stan obecny a projektowane zmiany. Polemika z Anną Pazurą i Janem Uniejewskim

The article is a polemic. It contains arguments justifying the thesis that the signaling decisions of the Constitutional Tribunal have no effect, either on law-making process or on the application of law. Consequently, a...

Modele kierownictwa wewnętrznego w izbach pierwszych parlamentów

The aim of the article is to identify and describe the theoretical models of internal management in the first (lower) chambers of modern parliaments. As a result of the analysis, the author presents two such models, the...

Rola parlamentu w budowie nowego państwa tureckiego. I Wielkie Zgromadzenie Narodowe (1920–1923)

In the article the First Turkish Grand National Assembly, operating in Ankara between 1920 and 1923, is discussed. The legal status of this organ in the light of its first legal acts of 1920 and the Constitutional Act of...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP305643
  • DOI -
  • Views 53
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Joanna M. Karolczak (2018). W sprawie powoływania członków Krajowej Rady Sądownictwa. PRZEGLĄD SEJMOWY, 145(2), 146-153. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-305643