Web-conferencing as a viable method for group decision research

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2012, Vol 7, Issue 5

Abstract

Studying group decision-making is challenging for multiple reasons. An important logistic difficulty is studying a sufficiently large number of groups, each with multiple participants. Assembling groups online could make this process easier and also provide access to group members more representative of real-world work groups than the sample of college students that typically comprise lab Face-to-Face (FtF) groups. The main goal of this paper is to compare the decisions of online groups to those of FtF groups. We did so in a study that manipulated gain/loss framing of a risky decision between groups and examined the decisions of both individual group members and groups. All of these dependent measures are compared for an online and an FtF sample. Our results suggest that web-conferencing can be a substitute for FtF interaction in group decision-making research, as we found no moderation effects of communication medium on individual or group decision outcome variables. The effects of medium that were found suggest that the use of online groups may be the preferred method for group research. To wit, discussions among the online groups were shorter, but generated a greater number of thought units, i.e., they made more efficient use of time.

Authors and Affiliations

Michel J. J. Handgraaf, Kerry F. Milch, Kirstin C. Appelt, Philip Schuette, Nicole A. Yoskowitz and Elke U. Weber

Keywords

Related Articles

Predicting biases in very highly educated samples: Numeracy and metacognition

We investigated the relations between numeracy and superior judgment and decision making in two large community outreach studies in Holland (n=5408). In these very highly educated samples (e.g., 30–50% held graduate degr...

Rebate subsidies, matching subsidies and isolation effects

In a series of recent experiments (Davis, Millner and Reilly, 2005, Eckel and Grossman, 2003, 2005a-c, 2006), matching subsidies generate significantly higher charity receipts than do theoretically equivalent rebate sub...

The Regret Elements Scale: Distinguishing the affective and cognitive components of regret

Regret is one of the most common emotions, but researchers generally measure it in an ad-hoc, unvalidated fashion. Three studies outline the construction and validation of the Regret Elements Scale (RES), which distingui...

A new intuitionism: Meaning, memory, and development in Fuzzy-Trace Theory

Combining meaning, memory, and development, the perennially popular topic of intuition can be approached in a new way. Fuzzy-trace theory integrates these topics by distinguishing between meaning-based gist representatio...

Survey of time preference, delay discounting models

The paper surveys over twenty models of delay discounting (also known as temporal discounting, time preference, time discounting), that psychologists and economists have put forward to explain the way people actually tra...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678023
  • DOI -
  • Views 131
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Michel J. J. Handgraaf, Kerry F. Milch, Kirstin C. Appelt, Philip Schuette, Nicole A. Yoskowitz and Elke U. Weber (2012). Web-conferencing as a viable method for group decision research. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(5), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678023