Who are Better at Evaluating Faculty Teaching Peers or Students?

Journal Title: Psychology and Cognitive Sciences - Open Journal - Year 2017, Vol 3, Issue 1

Abstract

In any Comprehensive Faculty Evaluation System it is important to define the broad range of roles that faculty must play in order to be successful. It is also important to identify the sources of information necessary to evaluate faculty performance in their various roles. One of the roles that are always present in any comprehensive faculty evaluation system is that of Teaching. There are a plethora of articles and books on the most appropriate sources for evaluating this role such as Dean, Department Head, Peers, Students, Self, etc. Of these sources, students have received the greatest amount of attention over the past 50 or more years. For many of those concerned with the use of student ratings of faculty teaching, peer evaluation has been presented as the antidote. This typically manifests itself in the form of peers conducting classroom visitations and observations. When peers conduct classroom visitations and observations they typically represent a very limited sample of class meetings and are conducted without the benefit of a reliable and valid observational checklist. In addition, peers tend to judge the observed faculty member’s performance against their own personal standards, which may or may not be appropriate. Therefore, typical peer evaluation of classroom teaching, tends to yield unreliable and invalid data upon which to judge a particular faculty member’s teaching performance.

Authors and Affiliations

Lawrence M. Aleamoni

Keywords

Related Articles

COMPCOR: A Computer Program for Comparing Correlations Using Confidence Intervals

Although there have been separate programs written for computing confidence interval procedures for independent and dependent correlations for some standard statistical software packages, the user must have solid knowled...

Intertarget Distractors and Input Filter Compatibility in the Attentional Blink

The Attentional Blink (AB) refers to the impairment in report accuracy of a second target when presented shortly after a first target in a stream of distractors. The main goal of the present study was to understand the n...

Collaborative Intelligence: Optimizing Our Human-sized Digital Key Conversations for Transforming Organizations Smarter

In a volatile, uncertain, complex, ambiguous (VUCA) environment, millions of institutions in the world are constrained to modify a significant part of their structures, procedures, and habits. For most organizations, a t...

Developmental Interpersonal Neurobiology, Attachment Style and Mindsight

The importance of interrelationships cannot be overemphasized. “Human connections create the neural connections from which the mind emerges”.1( p.72) Dan Siegel described the two basic processes that shape the developing...

Evolutionary Roots of the Sex Difference in the Prevalence of Severe Anti-Social Behavior: A Literature Review

It has been well-established that males exceed females in the most severe manifestations of anti-social behavior. The biological and environmental causes of this sex difference has received considerable attention. Howeve...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP543477
  • DOI 10.17140/PCSOJ-3-e004
  • Views 170
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Lawrence M. Aleamoni (2017). Who are Better at Evaluating Faculty Teaching Peers or Students?. Psychology and Cognitive Sciences - Open Journal, 3(1), 1-. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-543477