Why are gainers more risk seeking

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2013, Vol 8, Issue 2

Abstract

The phenomenon that prior gains may increase people’s willingness to accept risky gambles is named as the house money effect (Thaler and Johnson, 1990). Many studies have shown that the “house money effect” is a robust phenomenon but few scholars explain the mechanism of it well. We suppose the reason for the house money effect is that the ante (starting amount) is from the prior gambling profits, and its potential loss has relatively low psychological value. To test this hypothesis, we designed a series of studies using two-stage gambles. A total of 915 university students participated. In Study 1, in addition to a standard condition (which replicated the basic effect), we test how people respond to “prospect theory, with memory” frame, a “concreteness” frame and “quasi-hedonic” editing. None of these types of frames result in a significant house money effect. In Study 2, we certify the reference point shift to 100 Yuan in the second-stage gamble, thus the house money effect can be regarded as the absence of loss aversion; Study 3, consisting of 3 sub-experiments, indicated that gambling profits and normal income will open different mental accounts which are spent quite differently. The pain of losing 100 Yuan allowance is more serious than that of losing 100 Yuan gambling wins. People will typically reject the gamble of 50/50 chance to gain or lose 100 Yuan if the ante is from the “normal income account”, but accept if the ante is from the “windfall account”. The results of the series of experiments prove the accuracy of our hypothesis mostly.

Authors and Affiliations

Jiaxi Peng, Danmin Miao and Wei Xiao

Keywords

Related Articles

Relativistic financial decisions: Context effects on retirement saving and investment risk preferences

We report a study of the effects the choice set on financial decision making related to retirement savings and risky investment. The participants were presented with either a full range of choice options or a limited sub...

A model-based approach for the analysis of the calibration of probability judgments

The calibration of probability or confidence judgments concerns the association between the judgments and some estimate of the correct probabilities of events. Researchers rely on estimates using relative frequencies com...

Risky choice in younger versus older adults: Affective context matters

Earlier frameworks have indicated that older adults tend to experience decline in their deliberative decisional capacity, while their affective abilities tend to remain intact (Peters, Hess, Västfjäll, & Auman, 2007). Th...

Delaying information search

In three studies, we examined factors that may temporarily attenuate information search. People are generally curious and dislike uncertainty, which typically encourages them to look for relevant information. Despite the...

The effect of military service on soldiers’ time preferences — Evidence from Israel

The current field study compares the time preferences of young adults of similar ages but in two very different environments, one more dangerous and uncertain than the other. Soldiers, college students and a control grou...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678049
  • DOI -
  • Views 103
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Jiaxi Peng, Danmin Miao and Wei Xiao (2013). Why are gainers more risk seeking. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(2), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678049