Why choose wisely if you have already paid? Sunk costs elicit stochastic dominance violations
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2018, Vol 13, Issue 6
Abstract
Sunk costs have been known to elicit violations of expected utility theory, in particular, the independence or cancellation axiom. Separately, violations of the stochastic dominance principle have been demonstrated in various settings despite the fact that descriptive models of choice favored in economics deem such violations irrational. However, it is currently unknown whether sunk costs also yield stochastic dominance violations. In two studies using a tri-colored roulette wheel choice task with non-equiprobable events yet equal payoffs, we observed that those who had sunk costs selected a stochastically dominated option significantly more than did those who had no costs. Moreover, a second study revealed that people chose a stochastically dominated option significantly more when the expected value was low compared to high. A model comparison of psychological explanations demonstrated that theories that incorporate a reference shift of the status quo could predict these sunk cost-based violations of stochastic dominance whereas other models could not.
Authors and Affiliations
Ryan K. Jessup, Lily B. Assaad and Katherine Wick
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP678386
- DOI -
- Views 158
- Downloads 0
Outcomes and expectations in dilemmas of trust
Rational trust decisions depend on potential outcomes and expectations of reciprocity. In the trust game, outcomes and expectations correspond to the structural factors of risk and temptation. Two experiments investigate...
Sacred values and conflict over Iran’s nuclear program
Conflict over Iran’s nuclear program, which involves a US-led policy to impose sanctions on Iran, is perceived by each side as a preeminent challenge to its own national security and global peace. Yet, there is little sc...
Actor/observer asymmetry in risky decision making
Are people willing to gamble more for themselves than what they deem reasonable for others? We addressed this question in a simplified computer gambling task in which subjects chose from a set of 10 cards. Subjects selec...
“Feeling more regret than I would have imagined”: Self-report and behavioral evidence
People tend to overestimate emotional responses to future events. This study examined whether such affective forecasting errors occur for feelings of regret, as measured by self-report and subsequent decision-making. Som...
How comparing decision outcomes affects subsequent decisions: The carry-over of a comparative mind-set
In the current paper we investigate how feedback over decision outcomes may affect future decisions. In an experimental study we demonstrate that if people receive feedback over the outcomes they obtained (“factual outco...