Why do the Russians succumb to the “strong-hand” government? Historical-cultural legitimacy of the Russian state leadership in the context of Yuri Pivovarov’s theory

Journal Title: Przegląd Narodowościowy - Review of Nationalities - Year 2017, Vol 7, Issue

Abstract

State leadership in Russia is determined by historical and cultural as well as by legal and institutional premises. The analysis of ways of obtaining legitimacy by state leaders of the Russian Federation is a borderline issue of political science, sociology, and history. The conditions that favor the creation of the archetype on the Russian ground are undoubtedly: extremely centralized political power in Russia (one central decision-making center whose decisions were arbitrarily arbitrary), the problem of the enforcement of the rules of the trilateral division of power (the legislative sphere dominated the legislature), the low level of control Social rulers (lack of effective legal mechanisms to verify the effects of their activities), paternalism of the leadership system and low participation of representative institutions in public life. The aim of the article is to situate in the field of considerations about the archetype of Russian power the concept of Yuri Pivovarov, according to which not only civilization baggage and the immaturity of civil society have decided the legitimacy of the state leadership of the Russian Federation. According to him, the problem of the participation of the political elite in the redistribution of goods (and the low level of participation of citizens in the process of ownership separation) is of significant importance. According to the theory of the Russian political scientist, the basis for understanding the phenomenon of Russian state leadership is the combination of elements of archetypal leadership with a proper interpretation of the relation of freedom – property.

Authors and Affiliations

Justyna Olędzka

Keywords

Related Articles

Slavdom as Christendom’s colony – Slavonic identity according to Zadruga

The topic of this article is Slavonic identity according to the Zadruga movement. Zadrugians believed that normal cultural and civilizational development of a nation is possible only if there is harmony between the ethno...

Prawosławne jurysdykcje kościelne we współczesnej Hiszpanii

Powstanie i rozwój prawosławia w Hiszpanii związany był z procesami migracyjnymi z przełomu XIX i XX w. Ze względów politycznych, ekonomicznych i społecznych na terenie Hiszpanii osiedlała się ludność prawosławna,...

Wpływ czynników gospodarczych na działanie systemu politycznego współczesnej Hiszpanii

Zasadniczym celem artykułu jest próba wskazania, w jakim stopniu czynniki gospodarcze wpły-wały i nadal wpływają na funkcjonowanie hiszpańskiego systemu politycznego. Autorka opraco-wania wychodzi z...

Myths and the American Nation: Jefferson’s Declaration and the development of American nationalism

The USA as a multinational country of immigrants is nevertheless a fertile ground for competing nationalist ideologies and the consequently competing myth-building that surrounds the construction of national identity. !e...

Israeli-Palestinian conflict – a catalog of problems to solve

Article refers to basic problem connected with Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Author divided this catalog into two groups. The first catalog includes all objective obstacles: Jerusalem issue, Jewish settlement question an...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP538963
  • DOI 10.1515/pn-2017-0004
  • Views 67
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Justyna Olędzka (2017). Why do the Russians succumb to the “strong-hand” government? Historical-cultural legitimacy of the Russian state leadership in the context of Yuri Pivovarov’s theory. Przegląd Narodowościowy - Review of Nationalities, 7(), 119-135. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-538963