Why do the Russians succumb to the “strong-hand” government? Historical-cultural legitimacy of the Russian state leadership in the context of Yuri Pivovarov’s theory

Journal Title: Przegląd Narodowościowy - Review of Nationalities - Year 2017, Vol 7, Issue

Abstract

State leadership in Russia is determined by historical and cultural as well as by legal and institutional premises. The analysis of ways of obtaining legitimacy by state leaders of the Russian Federation is a borderline issue of political science, sociology, and history. The conditions that favor the creation of the archetype on the Russian ground are undoubtedly: extremely centralized political power in Russia (one central decision-making center whose decisions were arbitrarily arbitrary), the problem of the enforcement of the rules of the trilateral division of power (the legislative sphere dominated the legislature), the low level of control Social rulers (lack of effective legal mechanisms to verify the effects of their activities), paternalism of the leadership system and low participation of representative institutions in public life. The aim of the article is to situate in the field of considerations about the archetype of Russian power the concept of Yuri Pivovarov, according to which not only civilization baggage and the immaturity of civil society have decided the legitimacy of the state leadership of the Russian Federation. According to him, the problem of the participation of the political elite in the redistribution of goods (and the low level of participation of citizens in the process of ownership separation) is of significant importance. According to the theory of the Russian political scientist, the basis for understanding the phenomenon of Russian state leadership is the combination of elements of archetypal leadership with a proper interpretation of the relation of freedom – property.

Authors and Affiliations

Justyna Olędzka

Keywords

Related Articles

Współczesna hiszpańska polityka pamięci (1999-2014)

W niniejszym artykule dokonana została analiza oraz próba systematyzacji współczesnej hiszpańskiej polityki pamięci. Osią aktualnych debat o przeszłości są w Hiszpanii dwa wydarzenia: hiszpańska wojna domowa (1936-193...

The Gypsy Baron Operetta (1885) as a musical document of a certain age

Considered a musical monument to the Austro- Hungarian Empire – The Gypsy Baron (originally Der Zigeunerbaron) of 1885 composed by Johann Strauss II (1825-1899) reveals how important position Maria Theresia had in the Em...

Initiated into Subordination. On Joyce Carol Oates’s I’ll Take You There

The article proposes a sociological reading of the novel I’ll Take You There by Joyce Carol Oates. Though the book can be classified as an initiation novel, it also constitutes an accusation of the very procedure of init...

Wpływ czynników gospodarczych na działanie systemu politycznego współczesnej Hiszpanii

Zasadniczym celem artykułu jest próba wskazania, w jakim stopniu czynniki gospodarcze wpły-wały i nadal wpływają na funkcjonowanie hiszpańskiego systemu politycznego. Autorka opraco-wania wychodzi z...

Nationalism and the issue of nation-building in the nineteenth century’s Georgian political thought

In this article, we discuss two different directions about the Georgian nationalism of the 19th century: first we consider, thetrinity of language, homeland, faith – maybe one of the best classical formulations of nation...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP538963
  • DOI 10.1515/pn-2017-0004
  • Views 63
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Justyna Olędzka (2017). Why do the Russians succumb to the “strong-hand” government? Historical-cultural legitimacy of the Russian state leadership in the context of Yuri Pivovarov’s theory. Przegląd Narodowościowy - Review of Nationalities, 7(), 119-135. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-538963