Winter wheat productivity in relation to water availability and growing intensity

Journal Title: ŽEMDIRBYSTĖ-AGRICULTURE - Year 2010, Vol 97, Issue 3

Abstract

The study was aimed at water availability effects on productivity of winter wheat in relation to growing intensity, including preliminary testing of the DSSAT v4.0.2.0 model. For this purpose we analysed research material on winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) performance in the field experiments carried out at the Lithuanian Institute of Agriculture in Dotnuva, Kėdainiai, Central Lithuania during the periods 1989–1991 and 2007–2009. The soil of the experimental site is light loam, Endocalcari-Epihypogleyic Cambisol (CMg-p-w-can). Comparison of simulated and measured grain yield values in three cropping seasons 1989, 1990 and 1991, involving the results from the treatments where winter wheat cv. ‘Širvinta 1’ had been applied with N60 in spring, showed a good match judging from the correlation (R2 = 0.81) and data scatter according to 1:1 line. However, on the plots without N fertilisation the grain yield was underestimated. A series of experiments carried out on the winter wheat cv. ‘Ada’ during 2007–2009 involved three levels of growing intensity – traditional, integrated and organic. Soil moisture availability was measured with “Watermark” sensors and water stress was simulated by the DSSAT v4.0.2.0 model. The DSSAT model and soil moisture sensors produced comparable estimations of water shortage and can be considered as useful tools for monitoring water availability status in winter wheat crops. Winter wheat biomass accumulation and grain yield in field experiments were influenced by the growing intensity and water availability during the growing season, and likely, by the interaction between these two factors. Winter wheat yield was well predicted by the DSSAT v4.0.2.0 model in the treatments applied with N fertilisers in the years devoid of severe water stress. However, the accuracy of estimations declined in the seasons with longer droughty periods and in the treatments without N application.

Authors and Affiliations

Virmantas Povilaitis, Sigitas Lazauskas

Keywords

Related Articles

Weed response to soil tillage, catch crops and farmyard manure in sustainable and organic agriculture

The influence of soil tillage, different catch crop species (Trifolium pratense L., Lolium multiflorum Lam., Sinapis alba L., Brassica napus L.) for green manure as well as farmyard manure on weed infestation in a barley...

Soil physical properties and earthworms as affected by soil tillage systems, straw and green manure management

Conventional tillage is not only high energy and labour consuming process, but it can also have a negative impact on soil properties. The objective of this study was to determine the influence of different tillage system...

Comparison of winter oilseed rape varieties: cold acclimation, seed yield and quality

The purpose of our study was to investigate and compare the acclimatization to wintering, productivity formation, as well as seed yield and quality of different varieties of winter oilseed rape plants. The studied variet...

Correlation between endogenous elements and development of hollowing in the root of radish (Raphanus sativus L.) cultivars

The present investigation was carried out to discover the relationship between endogenous element content determined by Wavelength-Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence (WDXRF) spectrometer and development of hollowing in the ra...

Soil surface carbon dioxide exchange rate as affected by soil texture, different long-term tillage application and weather

The current study was carried out at the Lithuanian Institute of Agriculture in Dotnuva on an Endocalcari-Epihypogleyic Cambisol (CMg-p-w-can). It was aimed to investigate the effect of air and soil temperature, air humi...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP113503
  • DOI -
  • Views 104
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Virmantas Povilaitis, Sigitas Lazauskas (2010). Winter wheat productivity in relation to water availability and growing intensity. ŽEMDIRBYSTĖ-AGRICULTURE, 97(3), 59-68. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-113503