«YES» & «NO»: EPISTEMIC MODALITY OR MEMORY OF MEANING?

Journal Title: Мова - Year 2014, Vol 0, Issue 22

Abstract

The present investigation focuses on the remarks that express subjective evaluation in communication and contain or do not contain a predication structure in its traditional understanding of a subjectpredicate nexus. The author determines the status of the aforementioned type of utterances with the newlysuggested term «truth-evaluation remarks» and analyses their role in the process of speech interaction of the communicants, paying special attention to the utterances devoid an explicit structure of predication. The whole corpus of truth-evaluation remarks falls into three classes, two of which are polar in their appraising the situation and the third is represented by a class of indefinite remarks. A conclusion is made as to the predominance of non-predication structured utterances for making a truth-evaluation statement within the classes of both positive and negative remarks. However, the quantitative ratio of the remarks in polar classes is not the same, with the positive evaluation utterances cropping by far more often. From the point of view of information storage and digestion, «Yes» and «No» represent mathematical absolutes of counter-polarity and function as ready-to-use clichés in speech. The psychological grounding of such truth-evaluation markers lies in the memory of meaning characteristic of human mind and functioning as systemisers of the associations that reflect the object’s most important characteristics as taken in by the speaker. In fact, predominance of the non-predication structured utterances over those containing a structure of predication is explained by the absence of necessity to generate new structures of predication with there already existing non-predication structured remarks. The results of the carried-out investigation leads to the conclusion about truth-evaluation statements serving as special language units which provide communicants’ feedback and direct the dialogical process, involving mental associations from the memory of meaning.

Authors and Affiliations

I. B. Morozova

Keywords

Related Articles

SIMILE STRUCTURE AS AN INCOMPLETE SUBORDINATE CLAUSE

The purpose of the present research is to improve the accuracy of simile structures system of the Russian language, putting the focus on the grammatical nature of comparisons. The object under the study is simile as a fi...

THE WAYS OF AROMATONYMS’ ORIGIN

The article is dedicated to the ways of origin of proper names denoting perfumes — aromatonyms. English aromatonyms were chosen as the object of the study, onymisation and transonymisation as means of the origin — the su...

METAPHOR AND METONYMY AS COGNITIVE-SEMANTIC MECHANISMS OF NEOLOGY OF SOMATIC GERMAN PHRASEOLOGY

The subject of the research paper are the basic mechanisms and the main principles of phraseological neology. The circle of our scientific research includes the basic mechanisms of neology of German somatic phraseology t...

PRINCIPLES OF DEFINITION OF THE NOMINATHEMES OF COMPLEX TYPE

Object of the paper is to defi nee formal peculiarities of nominathemes of complex type. Object under analysis is processes of speech and language nomination in the context of their diversity. Subject under analysis is a...

THE INTERACTION BETWEEN TROPES IN THE PROSE OF A. BELY

The purpose of the article is to identify the syncretistic trails characteristic for the idiostyle of A. Bely, based on the interaction of the verbal metaphor and verbal metonymy; describe the semantic mechanisms of such...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP433326
  • DOI -
  • Views 73
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

I. B. Morozova (2014). «YES» & «NO»: EPISTEMIC MODALITY OR MEMORY OF MEANING?. Мова, 0(22), 107-113. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-433326