3,3′-Dimethoxybenzidine. Determination in workplace air

Journal Title: Podstawy i Metody Oceny Środowiska Pracy - Year 2019, Vol 35, Issue 2

Abstract

3,3’-Dimethoxybenzidine (DMOB) is a substance classified as a carcinogen. The recommended maximum admissible concentration (MAC) value for this substance in workplace air is 0.2 mg/m3. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a sensitive method for the determination of 3,3’-dimethoxybenzidine concentrations in workplace air in the range from 1/10 to 2 MAC values, in accordance with the requirements of standard PN-EN 482. The method consists in passing air that contains DMOB through a sulfuric acid-treated glass fiber filters, washing out the substance settled on the filter, using water and solution of sodium hydroxide, liquid-liquid extraction with toluene, replacing dissolvent with acetonitrile and analyzing the obtained solution. Studies were performed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) technique. An Agilent Technologies (Germany) liquid chromatograph, series 1200, with a fluorescence detector (FLD) was used in the experiment. In the test, an Ultra C18 column of dimensions: 250 x 4.6 mm, with a 10 x 4.0 mm precolumn (Restek, USA) was applied. This method is linear within the 1.08 μg/ml to 21.60 μg/ml working range, which is equivalent to air concentrations from 0.02 to 0.4 mg/m3 for a 54-L air sample. The analytical method described in this paper allows for selective determination of 3,3’-dimethoxybenzidine in workplace air in the presence of 1,4-phenylenediamine, benzidine, aniline, 3,3’-dimethylbenzidine, 2-nitrotoluene, 3,3’-dichlorobenzidine and azobenzene. The method is characterized by good precision and accuracy and meets the criteria for the performance of procedures for the measurement of chemical agents, listed in EN 482. The method may be used for the assessment of occupational exposure to 3,3’-dimethoxybenzidine and the associated risk to workers’ health. The developed method of determining 3,3’-dimethoxybenzidine has been recorded as an analytical procedure (see appendix). This article discusses the problems of occupational safety and health, which are covered by health sciences and environmental engineering.<br/><br/>

Authors and Affiliations

Joanna Kowalska

Keywords

Related Articles

Cyklopentan. Oznaczanie w powietrzu środowiska pracy metodą chromatografii gazowej ze spektrometrią mas

W wyniku przeprowadzonych badań opracowano metodę oznaczania cyklopentanu w powietrzu na stanowiskach pracy z zastosowaniem chromatografii gazowej ze spektrometrią mas. Metoda polega na: adsorpcji cyklopentanu w ru...

Amended method for determining iron oxides in workplace air

This method is based on collecting iron oxides on a membrane filter, mineralizing the sample with concentrated nitric acid and preparing the solution for analysis in diluted nitric acid. Iron oxides in the solution are d...

Selen i jego związki. Metoda oznaczania w powietrzu na stanowiskach pracy

Metodę stosuje się do oznaczania selenu (Se) i jego związków w powietrzu na stanowiskach pracy.Metoda polega na: przepuszczeniu badanego powietrza przez filtr membranowy, mineralizacji próbki z zastosowaniem stężonego kw...

Ethylenediamine. Determination in workplace air with high performance liquid chromatography – spectrophotometric technique

Ethylenediamine (EDA) is a colorless, viscous liquid with ammonia-like odor. It is used as an intermediate in manufacturing chelating agents (EDTA), fungicide, poliamide and formaldehyde-urea resins, surfactants, corrosi...

Tin and its inorganic compounds. Method of determining in workplace air

Tin at room temperature is a soft, silvery metal. In the industry it is used as a component of bearing, brazing and casting alloys and for the preparation of protective coatings, dishes and tin amalgam.Tin compounds are...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP599824
  • DOI 10.5604/01.3001.0013.2527
  • Views 97
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Joanna Kowalska (2019). 3,3′-Dimethoxybenzidine. Determination in workplace air. Podstawy i Metody Oceny Środowiska Pracy, 35(2), 113-125. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-599824