A clinical study of feto-maternal outcome of tocolytic agent nifedipine as compared to Isoxsuprine Hydrochloride in preterm labour

Journal Title: MedPulse -International Medical Journal - Year 2015, Vol 2, Issue 9

Abstract

Introduction: Preterm labor and delivery is one of the biggest challenges for obstetricians and so are the preterm babies for the pediatricians. Preterm delivery affects 11% in U.S. or even greater in developing countries (23.3% in India) and it accounts for 40–75% of neonatal deaths. Incidence of preterm labor and delivery shows increasing trends in countries where data is available Aims and Objectives: To find out foetal and maternal outcome in the study group and to compare its efficacy with Isoxsuprine Hydrochloride. Methodology: A one-year study was undertaken in the department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Assam Medical College and Hospital, Dibrugarh from 1st August 2005 – 31st July 2006, to find the tocolytic efficacy of Nifedipine and its foeto-maternal outcome and to compare clinically the efficacy with that of Isoxsuprine Hydrochloride. This was a Randomized Clinical Study. 100 patients with preterm labour were included in the study randomly. Result: The mean time taken to lessen or stop uterine contractions sufficiently was significantly less in the Nifedipine Group (1.64±1.015 hrs) than in the Isoxsuprine Group (11.94±10.557 hrs). p<001.There is a significant difference between the mean prolongation of pregnancy by Nifedipine (46.13±17.78 days) and by Isoxsuprine (27.35±20.60 days). p<0.001 which is very highly significant. The mean birth weight in Nifedipine group was 2.618±0.366 kg and in Isoxsuprine 2.156±0.624 kg. This observed difference was highly significant. Maternal Mortality was nil in both the groups. The Perinatal mortality was 1(2%) in Nifidipine , was significantly lower as compared to Isoxsuprine group 8 (16%).The successful tocolytic effect was significantly higher in Nifedipine group(100%) as Compared to Isoxsuprime (70%). Conclusions: In our study we have found Nifedipine as a better, safer and effective tocolytic compared to Isoxsuprine in the management of preterm labour.

Authors and Affiliations

Farzana Zahir, Kalyan Kumar Nath, H H Choudhury

Keywords

Related Articles

Spectrum of uncommon enhancing anterior mediastinal masses

We present to you three abnormally enhancing mediastinal masses in the form of Castelman's disease, Ectopic parathyroid adenoma and a pseudoaneurysm. Castelman's disease is a rare, benign, lymphoproliferative disorder. R...

A rare case of post traumatic chylous ascitis –managed conservatively

Context: Chylous ascites refers to the accumulation of lipid-rich lymph in the peritoneal cavity due to disruption of the lymphatic system secondary to traumatic injury or obstruction. Report: 54 years male came with h/o...

Prevalence of paraumbilical hernia and outcome at surgery inpatient department: A hospital based study

Introduction: Para umbilical hernia described as a acquired defect through decussating fibers of line a alba either above or below the umbilicus. It is more common in female 2, abdominal pressure increases in multiparty...

Mycological study on incidence of tinea incognito in a tertiary hospital

Objective: The aim of the study was to analyses the clinical and mycological features of tinea incognito cases, distribution of the etiological agents and commonly affected age group and gender also evaluated in this stu...

A comparative study of hernia with respect to visual analogue scale for post-operative pain

Introduction: Inguinal hernia repair surgeries are among the commonest general surgical procedures performed worldwide and hence due effort has been taken over the years to reduce the morbidity associated with them. Post...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP192964
  • DOI -
  • Views 99
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Farzana Zahir, Kalyan Kumar Nath, H H Choudhury (2015). A clinical study of feto-maternal outcome of tocolytic agent nifedipine as compared to Isoxsuprine Hydrochloride in preterm labour. MedPulse -International Medical Journal, 2(9), 483-487. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-192964