A comparative study between inj. ropivacaine 0.75% and inj.ropivacaine 0.75% with inj. dexmedetomidine in lumbar epidural anesthesia for vaginal hysterectomies

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 1

Abstract

Introduction: Regional anesthesia has lots of advantages compared to general anesthesia for Vaginal hysterectomy. Intrathecal anesthesia and Epidural anaesthesia are regional anaesthesia techniques used for Vaginal Hysterectomy. Aim and Objectives: 1.To study the adjuvant effect of alpha 2 agonist DEXMEDETOMIDINE with local anesthetic (ROPIVACAINE 0.75%) in lumbar epidural anesthesia in form of onset and lasting period of sensory and motor blockade, variation in hemodynamic parameter, post-operative analgesia. Materials and Methods: The study population was randomly divided into, 25 patients in each group. 1. Group R (n=25) -20ml of 0.75% ropivacaine; 2. Group RD (n=25) -20ml of 0.75% ropivacaine + 1µg/kg of dexmedetomidine. With the patients in sitting position, epidural space was identified by hanging drop method and confirmed by loss of resistance technique to air using 18G Tuohy needle via the midline approach at either L2-3 or L3-4 inter spinous space. An epidural catheter was fixed at 3 cms inside the epidural space. Result and Interpretation: result shows the prolonged sensory and motor blockage in RD group. Onset of sensory and motor blockade is stastaticaly significant. Sedation score is higher in RD group. Difference in heamodynamic parameters were statistically not significant. Parameters and side effects between two groups. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine given epidurally with ropivacaine produces synergistic effect of profound and prolonged motor blockade and sensory blockade with better sedation and hemodynamic stability. Ropivacaine and dexmedetomidine can be a safe and effective alternate for epidural blockade in vaginal hysterectomies.

Authors and Affiliations

Shubhendu Bajpal, Nanda Upadhyaya, Rina Gadhavi

Keywords

Related Articles

Comparison of dexmedetomidine versus esmolol (Intravenously) in reduction of cardiovascular responses to intubation during induction of general anesthesia- A randomised clinical trial

Introduction and Aim: The cardiovascular changes to airway manipulation like tachycardia and hypertension occur secondary to catecholamine secretion. These changes make less effects on normal patients but can be hazardou...

2014 ACC/AHA guidelines for cardiac patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery – omitted zones

With increase in life-expectance and also increase in life-style induced diseases, more and more patients suffering from cardiovascular disease are coming for non-cardiac surgery.

Difficult Intubation: Prospective observational study to evaluate it’s key predictors

Introduction: Airway assessment to identify the predictors of difficult intubation (DI) during general anaesthesia is very important to maintain patient safety and prevent untoward events like hypoxia and brain damage. T...

A study on the feasibility of using ENTONOX as an analgesic in the casualty for pain relief vs fentanyl

Background: Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a gas, which provides good analgesia without many side effects for short procedures outside the operating room.It is combined with 50% oxygen and is available in premixed cylinders as E...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP472798
  • DOI 10.18231/2394-4994.2018.0014
  • Views 71
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Shubhendu Bajpal, Nanda Upadhyaya, Rina Gadhavi (2018). A comparative study between inj. ropivacaine 0.75% and inj.ropivacaine 0.75% with inj. dexmedetomidine in lumbar epidural anesthesia for vaginal hysterectomies. Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia, 5(1), 80-85. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-472798