A Comparative Study of Airtraq with Macintosh Laryngoscope for Intubation in Paediatric Population

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia - Year 2019, Vol 6, Issue 2

Abstract

ontext: Paediatric airway is different than adult airway in terms of anatomy and physiology, therefore techniques and tools for securing the airway are different. Macintosh laryngoscope is most commonly used but, Airtraq is new tool, that allows high quality viewing of the vocal cords, without requiring a straight line of sight. Aims: To compare use of Airtraq with Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation in paediatric subject posted for elective surgeries. Materials and Methods: After written and informed consent of parents/ guardians, 50 patients of ASA 1 & 2, 2 - 6 years of age were divided into two groups (group A & M). Patients pre-medicated with ondansetron, glycopyrrolate, midazolam, paracetamol. Anaesthesia was induced with ketamine, propofol, succinylcholine and maintain on O2, N2O, sevoflurane and atracurium. Group M (n=25) were intubated with Macintosh and group A (n=25) patients with Airtraq. Intubation time, number of attempts, optimization manoeuvres were recorded. Hemodynamic changes were recorded before induction and after induction at interval of 1, 3, 5 minutes after intubation. Statistical analysis: The statistical analysis was assessed by unpaired t-test on Microsoft excel and IBM SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) version 21. P-value significant if <0.05. Results: Time taken for intubation was 33.96 + 15.7 seconds for group A and 44.80 + 16.3 seconds for group M. The calculated p value (p=0.02) showed there was statistically significance. Conclusion: Airtraq required shorter time to intubate, lesser number of attempts, lesser optimization manoeuvres’ and better laryngeal view as compared to Macintosh in paediatric patients.

Authors and Affiliations

Gaurang K. Patel

Keywords

Related Articles

Effect of Oral Clonidine Premedication on Perioperative Haemodynamic Response and Postoperative Sedation for Patients undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Background: Laparoscopy is now preferred because of various advantages such as reduced post operative pain, faster recovery and shorter hospital stays. It is associated with pneumoperitoneum, variations in patient positi...

Evaluation of Hyperbaric Intrathecal Ropivacaine and Levobupivacaine versus Racemic Bupivacaine in Patients with Infra-Umbilical Surgery: A Comparative Study

Introduction: Spinal anaesthesia is popular anaesthetic technique for lower abdominal and lower extremity surgery. Lidocaine and bupivacaine has been commonly used as anaesthetic agents. Ropivacaine had been found to be...

Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of Combinations of FentanylPropofol with Ketamine-Propofol in Short Gynaecological Day Care Procedures: A Randomised Double Blind Study

The advantages of ambulatory surgery is effective when patients get the benefits of day care anaesthesia.This is possible by using rapid acting intravenous anaesthetic agents. Aim: Comparative the effects of combination...

A Study to Compare the Effect of Intrathecal Midazolam and Nalbuphine as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine for Infra-umbilical Surgeries

Context: Since spinal anaesthesia provides analgesia for short time with local anaesthetics, many intrathecal adjuvants to local anaesthetic drugs have been addressed to augment the clinical efficiency and duration of an...

Effect of Propofol and Fentanyl with the Controls to Prevent Emergence Agitation in Children Receiving Sevoflurane for Adenotonsillectomy

Background: The administration of a single dose of propofol is reported to be effective in decreasing the incidence and severity of emergence agitation in children following sevoflurane anesthesia. Aim: Tocompare the eff...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP618869
  • DOI 10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.6219.9
  • Views 80
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Gaurang K. Patel (2019). A Comparative Study of Airtraq with Macintosh Laryngoscope for Intubation in Paediatric Population. Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia, 6(2), 429-432. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-618869