A Comparative Study of Butorphanol Versus Pethidine with Bupivacaine Heavy During Spinal Anaesthesia
Journal Title: Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia - Year 2019, Vol 6, Issue 2
Abstract
Background: Management of postoperative pain is essential for the smooth recovery of the patients. Intrathecal opioids are commonly used adjuvants to bupivacaine heavy for improving the quality of spinal anaesthesia. There are less number of studies comparing intrathecal butorphanol and pethidine. Aims: To compare the effects of intrathecal butorphanol versus pethidine on spinal anaesthesia produced by bupivacaine heavy.Settings and design: A prospective randomized double blind study. Materials and methods: 100 patients of ASA 1 & 2 undergoing spinal anaesthesia were randomly allotted to group A or B. Group A received intrathecal 0.5 mg butorphanol + 2.5 ml 0.5% bupivacaine heavy. Group B received intrathecal 25 mg pethidine + 2.5 ml 0.5% bupivacaine heavy. All patients were monitored for sensory and motor blockade, and occurrence of any side effects. Statistical analysis used: SPSS statistical software version 21.0. The mean and standard deviation computed for quantitative data. Proportions calculated for qualitative data. Appropriate test of significance used and a P value < 0.05 considered significant. Results: Mean time of duration of sensory blockade was 161.40 ± 12.291 minutes in group A and 147.10 ± 8.087 minutes in group B, which is statistically significant (p<0.001). Mean time of duration of analgesia was 304.70 ± 22.484 minutes in group A and 215.26 ± 16.359 minutes in group B, which is statistically significant (p<0.001). Neither of the groups had prolonged motor blockade or adverse effects. Conclusion: Intrathecal butorphanol and pethidine work synergistically with bupivacaine heavy to prolong the duration of sensory blockade and analgesia without prolonging the motor blockade and without causing any significant side effects. The effect is more pronounced with butorphanol compared to pethidine.
Authors and Affiliations
Vishwanath ,
A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Study to Compare Dexmedetomidine and Labetalol in Attenuation of Cardiovascular Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation
Background: The pressure response, which is part of a huge spectrum of stress response, results from the increase in sympathetic and sympathoadrenal activity. This study aims to evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidine and...
A Randomized Clinical Trial to Compare the Efficacy of Dexmedetomedine and Magnesium Sulphate for Attenuation of Pressor Response in Abdominal Laproscopic Surgeries
Objectives: To evaluate the response of dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulphate for attenuating stress response in laparoscopic abdominal surgeries. Material and methods: Patients of ASA grade I and II aged between 20 and...
Utilization of Ondansetron and Dexamethasone for Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy at Bhuj, Kutch, Gujarat: A Randomised Control Trial
Background and Aim: Postoperative nausea and vomiting still occur with unacceptable frequency and the description of it as the ‘Big Little Problem’ encapsulates much of the general perception. The incidence is quite high...
Comparison of Premixed Versus Sequential Administration of Fentanyl as an Adjuvant to Intrathecal Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Infra-Umbilical Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Study
Opioids and local anaesthetics administered together intra-thecally have potent synergistic analgesia. Aims and Objectives: To compare the efficacy of premixed versus sequential administration of fentanyl as an adjuvant...
Comparative Clinical Study of 0.5% Lignocaine Alone and Combination of 0.25% Lignocaine Withpentazocine and Pancuronium In Intravenous Regional Anaesthesia for Upper Limb Orthopaedic Surgeries
Background and Objective: Intravenous regional anaesthesia with conventional large dose of local anaestheticis associated with serious systemic toxicity when the tourniquet deflates unexpectedly during the procedure or w...