A Comparative Study of Effects of General Anaesthesia and Subarachnoid Block For LSCS in Terms of Maternal and Foetal Outcome in Preeclmaptic Patient

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia - Year 2017, Vol 4, Issue 3

Abstract

Background: Preeclampsia is hypertensive and multisystem disorder of pregnancy. It is a leading cause of maternal and foetal morbidity and mortality. There is increased rate of lower segment caesarean section in preeclamptic parturient. So we designed a comparative study to assess the effects of general anaesthesia and subarachnoid block on maternal and foetal outcome in preeclamptic patients. Materials and Methods: One hundred consenting patients of age 16 to 32 years with severe preeclampsia posted for elective or emergency lower segment caesarean section were randomly assigned to one of the two groups; group GA, group SA who received general anaesthesia and subarachnoid block respectively. Variables in mother like systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) was recorded before induction, just after induction then 5, 10, 30, 60 minutes after induction and postoperatively at 15, 30, 60, 90, 120 minutes after the completion of operation. After delivery of the baby the APGAR score at 1 min and 5 min was recorded. Result: No maternal mortality is noted in either of the two groups. Hypertension (10% group GA), hypotension (14% group SA), and pulmonary oedema 4% in GA group whereas none in SA group was seen intraoperatively. Birth asphyxia was developed in foetus 8% in group GA and 2% in group SA. Foetal APGAR score at one minute was 7.42±1.16 & 8.96±0.66 in GA and SAB respectively higher with subarachnoid block. Conclusion: subarachnoid block serves better as a mode of anaesthesia for LSCS in severe preclamptic parturients in terms of both intraoperative and postoperative morbidities.

Authors and Affiliations

Pankaj Sharma

Keywords

Related Articles

Comparison of Ultrasound Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block and Caudal Epidural Block for Pain Relief in Children Undergoing Unilateral Inguinal Herniotomy

Transversusabdominis plane block (TAP) has emerged as a simple, safe technique for post-operative analgesia in lower abdominal surgeries for adults. Its superiority over the most preferred caudal block in paediatric surg...

A Comparative Study between Dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg and and 25mg/kg of 50% Magnesium Sulphate as Adjuvants with 0.5% Lidocaine for Intravenous Regional Anaesthesia

Intravenous regional anaesthesia (IVRA) also called as Bier’s block is a commonly used anaesthetic technique for surgical procedures on the upper extremities. Many adjuvants have been used to improve the quality of intra...

A Comparative Study of Hyperbaric 0.5% Levobupivacaine with Bupivacaine 0.5% for Spinal Anaesthesia in Elective Surgeries

Background: Subarachnoid block is popular and commonly used worldwide. The advantage of an awake patient, minimal drug cost and rapid patient turnover has made this the method of choice for many surgical procedures. Amon...

Comparision of Intrathecal Fentanyl and Clonidine with 0.5% of Bupivacaine Heavy in Spinal Anaesthesia in Elderly Urological Surgeries

Background: Lipophilic opioids (fentanyl) and alpha-2 agonist (clonidine) are increasingly being administered intrathecally as adjuncts. They enhance the effect of spinal anaesthesia without prolonging motor recovery and...

Comparison of Levobupivacaine with or without Epinephrine for Lumbar Spine Surgery

Introduction: The aim was to establish if a decrease in the amount of epinephrine from 1:200,000 to 1:400,000 added to epidural levobupivacaine produces a comparable decrease in local anaesthetic assimilation from the ep...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP472055
  • DOI 10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.4317.34
  • Views 84
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Pankaj Sharma (2017). A Comparative Study of Effects of General Anaesthesia and Subarachnoid Block For LSCS in Terms of Maternal and Foetal Outcome in Preeclmaptic Patient. Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia, 4(3), 760-766. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-472055