A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EFFECTS OF SMOKING ON LIPID PROFILE AMONG HEALTHY SMOKERS AND NON-SMOKERS

Journal Title: Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 8

Abstract

BACKGROUND Coronary artery disease forms a major non-communicable disease in both developed and developing countries. In western countries, older age groups are affected whereas in our country India, it is common among younger age group. Many risk factors have been evaluated. Cigarette smoking contributes for major risk factor for coronary artery disease, atherosclerosis and peripheral vascular disorders. Mechanism of causing coronary artery disease is multifactorial, it has major adverse effects on lipid profile and homocysteine levels which are again risk factors for coronary artery disease. Hence, this study was undertaken to compare the effects of smoking cigarettes/beedis on lipid profile among smokers and non-smokers. MATERIALS AND METHODS It was a case - control study carried out on 50 healthy smokers and 50 healthy age and weight matched non-smokers attending the medicine OPD of Basaveshwara Medical College, Chitradurga from January to April 2017. Subjects in both groups were in the age range of 25-35 yrs., with no history of alcohol abuse, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hepatic impairment, renal disease or history of drug intake which alter the lipid profile. RESULTS The mean serum total cholesterol, serum triglycerides, serum LDL- cholesterol & serum VLDL-cholesterol were significantly higher while antiatherogenic serum HDL cholesterol were significantly lower in smokers when compared with non-smokers and it was statistically significant (p<0.001). CONCLUSION Present study shows a statistically significant relationship between cigarette smoking and increased lipid profile. Thus, chronic smokers are at the significant risk of developing Coronary Heart Disease. So, smokers should be counselled and encouraged to quit smoking and adopt a healthier life style.

Authors and Affiliations

Girish I, Harish I

Keywords

Related Articles

AORTIC ARCH-STUDY OF DIFFERENT BRANCHING PATTERNS

INTRODUCTION The arch of aorta is the continuation of ascending aorta which arises from the left ventricle inside the fibrous pericardium. The arch is convex upwards, behind and somewhat towards the left sided if it has...

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ORAL HAEMATINIC SYRUP IN CORRECTING IRON DEFICIENCY ANAEMIA IN PREGNANT AND POSTPARTUM WOMEN

BACKGROUND Although oral and intravenous iron therapies have been indicated for the treatment of iron deficiency anaemia (IDA), their utility is limited. Thus, there is a need for effective iron therapies that can addres...

PERCEPTIONS OF TEACHERS FROM NORTH KERALA ABOUT AN INDIAN MINDFULNESSBASED INTERVENTION (MLM- MINDFUL LIFE MANAGEMENT) FOLLOWING A ONE DAY INTRODUCTORY WORKSHOP

BACKGROUND Mindfulness, a concept with origin in the eastern meditation traditions, is finding increased ways of application in medical, educational and management settings. Research has shown that mindful individuals ar...

CLINICAL STUDY OF MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY OF PEOPLE LIVING WITH HIV (PLHIV) ADMITTED TO A TERTIARY HEALTH CENTRE IN GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH

INTRODUCTION Guntur district, which forms part of the AP state capital region, tops the list of HIV positive cases in the state. The district also had the dubious distinction of being the “HIV capital” in undivided Andhr...

A COMPARITIVE EVALUATION OF 0.75% ROPIVACAINE WITH CLONIDINE AND 0.75% ROPIVACAINE WITH DEXMEDETOMIDINE IN SUPRACLAVICULAR BRACHIAL PLEXUS BLOCK- A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY

BACKGROUND Brachial plexus blockade is considered as cornerstone of regional anaesthesia practice. Ropivacaine is a new amide, long acting, pure S (-) enantiomer and local anaesthetic. This study was done to compare clon...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP455796
  • DOI 10.18410/jebmh/2018/141
  • Views 91
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Girish I, Harish I (2018). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EFFECTS OF SMOKING ON LIPID PROFILE AMONG HEALTHY SMOKERS AND NON-SMOKERS. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare, 5(8), 696-698. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-455796