A comparative study of short proximal femoral nail and dynamic hip screw in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures
Journal Title: International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences - Year 2018, Vol 4, Issue 1
Abstract
Background: Incidence of intertrochanteric fractures has increased significantly during recent years due to rising age of population and sedentary life style. They are one of the most frequently operated fracture types. Intertrochanteric fractures occur predominantly in elderly patients with osteoporosis. Operative fixation is the treatment of choice. It can be extra medullary implant like dynamic hip screw (DHS) or intramedullary implant like proximal femoral nail (PFN). Objectives • Evaluation of effectiveness of PFN and DHS in the management of intertrochanteric fractures. • The advantages and disadvantages of the PFN and DHS in intertrochanteric fractures Materials and methods: These is a prospective study which was carried out from Feb 2015 to Feb 2016 in Government Medical College Kozhikode. In this study period 48 cases of intertrochanteric fractures were studied, out of which 24 cases were operated with PFN and 24 cases were operated with DHS. The results were evaluated and compared. Results: Most of the patients were between 50 to 80 years of age. Most common mode of injury was domestic fall. The mean time of fracture union was 16 weeks. 54.2% patients operated by PFN were unstable fractures and 58.3% patients operated by DHS were stable fractures. The functional outcome was calculated by Harris hip score during follow up in 2 week, 6 weeks.3 months 6 Months and 1 year. By 1 year follow up of operated patients 96% of patients with PFN had good to excellent results 4% had fair results. 88% patients with DHS had good to excellent results and 12% patient had fair results. Conclusion: There is not much difference in functional outcome of intertrochanteric fractures treated by DHS and PFN in our settings. PFN is used mainly in unstable fracture and DHS in stable intertrochanteric fractures. Surgical exposure is minimal in PFN so minimal blood loss and wound complication. Early mobilization is an advantage with PFN. PFN needed better operative skill than DHS.
Authors and Affiliations
Dr. Ravikumar V, Dr. Rashid MP
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP485732
- DOI 10.22271/ortho.2018.v4.i1m.127
- Views 106
- Downloads 0
Trochanteric femoral fractures treated by proximal femoral nail, a review of 110 cases
Intertrochanteric fractures are one of the most common fractures in osteoporotic individual. It is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Management of Intertrochanteric fractures causes more burden to th...
Outcome analysis of management of recurrent shoulder dislocation by latarjet procedure
Introduction: With the extreme range of movements, the shoulder joint is prone for dislocations. This could be due to traumatic or atraumatic, though the majority are atraumatic. With each subsequent episode of dislocati...
Neurofibrosarcoma of the median nerve of the hand: A case report
Neurofibrosarcoma is a rare malignant nerve sheath tumor with a lot of histological entities. In 70% of the cases, it is associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). We report the case of a 44-year-old female patient...
Assessing functional outcome using modified Harris hip score in patients undergoing total hip replacement
Introduction: Harris Hip Score (HHS) is used for assessing functional outcome in patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR). The present study aimed to assess patients who underwent THR for various indications with...
Vacuum assisted closure: Review on current application for post-operative wound management in orthopaedics
Background: Post operative wound dehiscence is a significant health problem. In imposes social and financial burdens. If the injury involves the exposure of bone, early coverage of the defect must be a goal of treatment...