A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF INTRATHECAL MIDAZOLAM AND FENTANYL AS ADDITIVES TO INTRATHECAL HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE (0.5%) FOR SPINAL ANAESTHESIA

Journal Title: Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences - Year 2017, Vol 6, Issue 38

Abstract

BACKGROUND Spinal anaesthesia by 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine is characterised by a relatively rapid onset of action with duration of anaesthesia for approximately 3 hours and profound motor blockade. Even though it provides effective pain relief in the initial postoperative period, these patients need rescue analgesia after 3 hours. To maximise postoperative analgesia, several adjuvants, such as opioids, Clonidine, Ketamine, neostigmine, etc. have been added to spinal local anaesthetics. Preservative free midazolam is also being used as an adjuvant to prolong the duration of block. Aims and Objectives- The present study was undertaken to compare the effects of intrathecal midazolam (1 mg) and fentanyl (25 micrograms) as additives to intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine (0.5 %) for spinal anaesthesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS A prospective double blind randomised controlled study was carried out on 100 adult patients. Patients were randomly selected by envelope method into two groups of 50 in each. Group “BF” - Bupivacaine plus fentanyl group; Group “BM” - Bupivacaine plus midazolam group. RESULTS There were no differences in the onset and duration of sensory blockade, and durations of complete and effective analgesia, when fentanyl 25 micrograms or midazolam 1 mg was used as additive to intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia. But midazolam was associated with fewer side effects compared to fentanyl. CONCLUSION Intrathecal combination of bupivacaine and midazolam offers same advantages in terms of onset and duration of sensory blockade and durations of complete and effective analgesia with fewer side effects compared to bupivacaine and fentanyl.

Authors and Affiliations

Kurmanadh K, Srilakshmi K

Keywords

Related Articles

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE LUNG VOLUME INCLUDED IN THE TANGENTIAL FIELD IN BODY CONTOUR BASED AND CT SCAN BASED 2-DIMENSIONAL RADIATION PLANNING IN BREAST CANCER TREATMENT

BACKGROUND Pneumonitis and lung fibrosis are some of the major toxicities of radiation in carcinoma breast, and the volume of lung included in radiation field should be as less as possible. One of the limitations of body...

MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF SUPERIOR ARTICULAR FACETS OF ATLAS VERTEBRA AND ITS CLINICAL APPLICATIONS

BACKGROUND The anatomy of the atlas vertebra reveals complex, three-dimensional structures, showing extensive variability in morphology. The large number of variations seen in the shape, size and depth of the superior ar...

COMPARING HIGH INTENSITY WITH LOW INTENSITY STATINS IN ACHIEVING OPTIMAL LDL GOALS AMONG CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE PATIENTS IN SUBURBAN POPULATION IN SOUTH INDIA

BACKGROUND Patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD), including those with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), should receive long-term, intensive lipid-lowering statin therapy. Target levels of low-density lipoprotein ch...

COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN INTRAVENOUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE AND ESMOLOL IN ATTENUATION OF HAEMODYNAMIC STRESS RESPONSE DURING ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION AND LARYNGOSCOPY

BACKGROUND Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation produce sympathetic overdrive by catecholamine release resulting in hypertension and tachycardia. Various agents are being tried to combat the intubation response. The...

PANCYTOPENIA- A CLINICO-HAEMATOLOGICAL STUDY

BACKGROUND Pancytopenia is an important clinico-haematological entity encountered in our daily clinical practice. There are varying clinical patterns, treatment modalities and outcomes for pancytopenia. The severity of p...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP212902
  • DOI 10.14260/Jemds/2017/660
  • Views 53
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Kurmanadh K, Srilakshmi K (2017). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF INTRATHECAL MIDAZOLAM AND FENTANYL AS ADDITIVES TO INTRATHECAL HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE (0.5%) FOR SPINAL ANAESTHESIA. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 6(38), 3061-3064. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-212902