A comparative study on the interpretation of phraseology used in histopathology reports between senders and receivers

Journal Title: IP Archives of Cytology and Histopathology Research - Year 2018, Vol 3, Issue 3

Abstract

Introduction Histopathology reports should provide clinicians with diagnostically accurate and medically useful information to afford the best management to the patientsAim and Objectives To make a comparative assessment of interpretation and use of the common descriptive phrases found in histopathology reports between clinicians and pathologists to interpret the degree of certainty among these phrases and to know the preferable phrase by clinicians and the most common phrase used by the pathologistsMaterials and Methods A questionnaire was constructed using eight most commonly used descriptive phrases found among 1500 randomly selected histopathology reports from 2017 histopathology register department of Pathology This was to compare the interpretation use and preferences of the descriptive phrases found in histopathology reports Four groups with 25 members in each were included in the questionnaire and were asked to assign a score from 0 to 5 for these phrases to know the diagnostic level of certainty The groups were consultant clinicians consultant pathologists clinical postgraduate students and pathology post graduate students Statistical analysis was done by calculating standard deviation student ttest and by p valueResults There was a wide variation in individual interpretation of phrases among the groupsThe preference of usage of these phrases by pathologists and by clinicians was diverseConclusion The adoption of limited number of descriptive phrases that are mutually understood and acceptable for use by both the pathologists and clinicians is recommended to avoid interpretive ambiguity in histopathology reportsKeywords Ambiguity Histopathology reports Phraseology Questionnaire

Authors and Affiliations

I. V Renuka, M. Atchyuta, P. Prema Latha

Keywords

Related Articles

Clinicopathological study of esophageal neoplastic lesions on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

Introduction: Aim of the study is to know the clinicopathological features of esophageal neoplastic lesions on upper gastrointestinal endoscopic biopsies and to document the pattern of presentation, risk factors and path...

Study of Paediatric Renal Biopsies with Clinicopathologic Correlation and Comparison with Literature on Adult Renal Biopsies

Introduction: Renal biopsy is frequently used in complete work-up for renal diseases. The kidney reacts in a limited number of patterns to various injuries and the clinical manifestations corresponding to these reactions...

Impact of socioeconomic risk factors on carcinoma cervix: Hospital based pap smear screening of 2 years in Bihar

Introduction Cervical cancer is leading cause of cancer related morbidity and mortality in Indian women with 123000 new cases and 67000 deaths annually Various socioeconomic associated factors like Income education parit...

Histopathology of endometrium in dysfunctional uterine bleeding

Introduction: Abnormal uterine bleeding is a common condition affecting women of reproductive age that has significant social and economic impact. Dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB) is defined as abnormal uterine bleed...

Spectrum of diseases presenting with lymphadenopathy in elderly: Fine needle aspiration cytology of 60 cases

Introduction Lymphadenopathy is one of the common clinical presentations in patients of all age group Lymphadenopathy can be due to reactive or infective cause but malignancy including metastastic deposits in are not unc...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP490576
  • DOI 10.18231/2456-9267.2018.0029
  • Views 88
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

I. V Renuka, M. Atchyuta, P. Prema Latha (2018). A comparative study on the interpretation of phraseology used in histopathology reports between senders and receivers. IP Archives of Cytology and Histopathology Research, 3(3), 140-143. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-490576