A comparison between epidural Butorphanol and Tramadol for postoperative analgesia, sedation and side effects using CSEA technique for surgeries below the level of umbilicus

Journal Title: International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research - Year 2016, Vol 7, Issue 11

Abstract

Background and Aims: Epidural analgesia using low doses of local anesthetic agent with or without adjuvants like opioids is a popular, simple, effective and economical way of providing postoperative analgesia. We proposed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of epidural opioids, Butorphanol and Tramadol using Combined Spinal Epidural Analgesia (CSEA) technique for surgeries below the level of umbilicus for postoperative analgesia, sedation and side effects. Methods: In this prospective, double blind, randomized controlled clinical trial, 60 patients aged 18 to 60 years, ASA grade 1 or 2 posted for planned elective surgery below the level of umbilicus were selected. Study Design: The patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups to receive postoperatively either 1 mg of inj. Butorphanol (dissolved in 10 ml of normal saline) (Group B) or 50 mg of inj. Tramadol (dissolved in 10 ml of normal saline) (Group T) epidurally as a bolus dose when the VAS score for pain was more than 4 after the conclusion of surgical procedure as the effect of spinal anaesthesia started wearing off. Statistics and Results: The mean duration of analgesia with tramadol (group T) 6.481 ( 0.86842) hrs. was significantly higher than with butorphanol (group B) i.e., 5.352 (0.33258) hrs with a p value of 0.0001. Pain scores were also significantly lower statistically in group B as compared to group T. Sedation scores were significantly higher in group B than group T, which was statistically highly significant (p= 0.0001). Conclusion: Both epidural, butorphanol and tramadol provided good postoperative analgesia. The duration of analgesia was longer with tramadol, quality of analgesia was better with butorphanol, sedation more with butorphanol as compared to tramadol and other side effects were comparable.

Authors and Affiliations

Preeti More, Charchill Wagh, Vandana Laheri

Keywords

Related Articles

Visual evoked potentials: Impact of age, gender, head size and BMI

Background and Objectives: Pattern-reversal visual evoked potential (PRVEP) is an objective, sensitive and non-invasive neurophysiological test that can prove to be a useful clinical tool in investigating the physiology...

Visual evoked potential changes in diabetes mellitus

Background: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) a metabolic disorder is the most common cause of neuropathy. Electrophysiological studies are commonly employed to detect the neuropathy. The present study was undertaken to find out th...

Behaviour Pattern regarding HIV/AIDS among Students of Selected Professional Institutes of Ghaziabad District of Uttar Pradesh.

Introduction: The annual number of AIDS-related deaths globally has been decreasing due to the significant scaling up of ART over the past few years. The estimated number of people who died from HIV- related illness in 2...

Perceptions and adoption of male contraceptives among men in Indonesia

Introduction: The Family Planning program implemented in Indonesia in the 1970s successfully increases the prevalence of contraception, and on the other hand, lowers fertility. Nevertheless, this success is marred by gen...

Screening for the sickle cell gene in Yavatmal District, Maharashtra, India: an approach to a major public health problem

Aim of the present study was to determine the feasibility of large-scale population screening for the sickle cell gene in different areas of Yavatmal District. A program designed to detect the sickle cell trait and sickl...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP368020
  • DOI 10.7439/ijbar.v7i11.3730
  • Views 79
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Preeti More, Charchill Wagh, Vandana Laheri (2016). A comparison between epidural Butorphanol and Tramadol for postoperative analgesia, sedation and side effects using CSEA technique for surgeries below the level of umbilicus. International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research, 7(11), 537-542. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-368020