A critique and analysis of jurisprudential views on the ruling for the sales of unknown with supplement
Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2016, Vol 48, Issue 104
Abstract
Substitute - either the sale or the price - needs to be clearly determined in terms of amount, substance or material, and any characteristics influencing the fee. And, the condition for the validity of the deal is that the two sides completely know and be aware of the contract being negotiated. Thus, if one side is mindful (informed) of the contract but the other is ignorant (uninformed), the deal is void. This is because in the case of ignorance to the object of the deal, it will be a risky one denounced by the Legislator; as we can read in the hadith: ‘The Prophet has forbidden risky sales.’ In the present paper, seven narratives have been reported all in all as regards the sales of unknown with supplement, insisting on the validity the sale. A number of arguments against this validity have also been mentioned. Then, the supportive and disproving views are critically reviewed. Finally, the invalidity and nullity of the sales of unknown with supplement.
Authors and Affiliations
Seyyed Mohammad Heydari Khormizi
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP190672
- DOI 10.22067/fiqh.v48i24.34931
- Views 67
- Downloads 0
Study of the Precondition for the Contemporaneity of the Attitude of the Intellectual with the Era of the Infallibles (Study of the Ways to Generalize the Authenticity of the Attitude of the Intellectual to the Newly-Appeared Attitudes)
The famous theory concerning the meaning and interpretation of text is called "intentionalism" which says: “The meaning or interpretation of a work is related to the intention of the creator of the work or is delimited a...
An introduction into the impediment removal rule (the return of prohibition in case of impediment removal)
One of the most widely used rules of jurisprudence is ‘impediment removal’ often expressed by the phrase ‘when impediment is removed, the forbidden is regained.’ The application of this rule in jurisprudential matters pr...
Analysis of Intellectuals’ Basis in “Reference of the Ignorant to the Learned” with the “Behavioristic” Method and its Comparison to “Reference of the Imitator to the Legal Authority”
Given that the most principle reason for imitation (taqlīd) is the intellectual basis in “the reference of the ignorant to the learned” and, in one respect, reliance on one’s personal conjectures and bringing up an “inte...
Examining the Truth and Falsehood from the Viewpoint of Legal Theoreticians
Nowadays, discussion about and analysis of ṣiḥḥa (truth) and fasād (falsehood) is a focus of attention in theological (uṣūlī) writings. This issue necessitates an explanation of the present structure of the discourse of...
A Jurisprudential Inquiry into the Authority of the Ruling Jurisconsult’s Opinion on Proving the Lunar Crescent Sighting
Moon is considered a natural calendar for human individuals. Proving the crescent sighting is among the issues that all human beings are somehow in need of. Similarly, the Islamic religious law has subjected some of the...