A Knowledge Concept Map: Structured Concept Analysis from Systematic Literature Review

Journal Title: Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation - Year 2017, Vol 13, Issue 3

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to present a mental model of knowledge as a concept map as an input to knowledge management (KM) investigations. This article’s extended knowledge concept map can serve as a resource where the investigation, development, or application of knowledge would be served with a broad mental model of knowledge. Previously unrelated concepts are related; knowledge concepts can sometimes be expressed as a range, i.e., certainty related states: view, opinion, sentiment, persuasion, belief, and conviction. Extrathesis is identified as a potential skill level higher than synthesis, and associated with the concepts: discovery, institution, insight (the event), revelation, or illumination that precedes innovation. Qualitative methods were used to gather and document concepts. System engineering and object analysis methods were applied to define and relate concepts. However, the theoretical sampling and theoretical saturation methods applied do not guarantee all appropriate concepts have been identified. Given the breadth, depth, and dimensionality of concepts of knowledge, later researchers may add additional concepts. This article provides evidence of additional things people know, an alternative to psychology’s acquaintanceship, understanding and placement of newer categorizations of knowledge in relation to older ones, and suggests that ranges for knowledge terms exist. This article extends the 2015 paper on this topic by: 1) taking a deeper look into epistemological terms and relationships, 2) providing contextual definitions, 3) suggesting extrathesis as an idea beyond synthesis, 4) updating the concept map; and 5) providing new insight on the overloaded knows including adding an eleventh know. It provides a much more solid basis for KM investigations than typical presentations, providing a broad understanding of knowledge that is beneficial.

Authors and Affiliations

Philip Sisson, Julie J. C. H. Ryan

Keywords

Related Articles

Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics in Controversial Sectors: Analysis of Research Results

Until recently, in business practice, there was a belief that companies were operating solely for the profit of their owners. Few companies have recognized the need to combine their activities with ethics, and in particu...

Developing Innovative Business Models in Social Ventures

Social ventures represent a new type of organizatin that aim to create sustainable social value, such as promotig the well-being of communitis and their existence is based on developing solutins to tackle complex social...

Percepton of Export Barriers at Different Stages of the Internatonalizaton Process - Evidence from European SMEs

This paper explores the evolution of export barriers along the firm’s internationalization process. Based on a sample of 7,515 European SMEs, we investigate the differences perceived by different groups of firms: compani...

Capable design or designing capabilities? An exploration of service design as an emerging organizational capability in Telenor – Martinkenaite

This empirical paper examines a process, starting with the managerial decision to make service design an organizational capability, and follows it as it unfolds over time within one organization. Service design has becom...

Collaboration Patterns and Product Innovation in the Basque Country : Does a Firm's Nationality Matter?

More and more, the ability to innovate can be considered as an explanatory factor in determining the long-term potential of firms to be competitive. Therefore, it is of increasing importance to understand the critical su...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP238406
  • DOI 10.7341/20171332
  • Views 106
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Philip Sisson, Julie J. C. H. Ryan (2017). A Knowledge Concept Map: Structured Concept Analysis from Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 13(3), 29-69. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-238406