A method to elicit beliefs as most likely intervals

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2015, Vol 10, Issue 5

Abstract

We show how to elicit the beliefs of an expert in the form of a “most likely interval”, a set of future outcomes that are deemed more likely than any other outcome. Our method, called the Most Likely Interval elicitation rule (MLI), asks the expert for an interval and pays according to how well the answer compares to the actual outcome. We show that the MLI performs well in economic experiments, and satisfies a number of desirable theoretical properties such as robustness to the risk preferences of the expert.

Authors and Affiliations

Karl H. Schlag and Joël J. van der Weele

Keywords

Related Articles

Validation and invariance across age and gender for the Melbourne Decision-Making Questionnaire in a sample of Portuguese adults

The personal pattern of coping with the stress associated with making decisions characterizes the way an individual makes choices and judgments. The Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire (MDMQ) analyses these personal...

Correlations of cognitive reflection with judgments and choices

We investigated the role of individual differences in cognitive reflection in decision making. We measured the performance of 157 participants in the cognitive reflection test (Frederick, 2005) and a number of decision-m...

Naturalness judgments by lay Americans: Process dominates content in judgments of food or water acceptability and naturalness

This study directly tests the hypothesis that, at least within the domains of food and drink for Americans, the judgment of naturalness has more to do with the history of an object, that is the processes that it has unde...

The effect of interruption on the decision-making process

Previous research has shown that interruptions can lead to delays and errors on the interrupted task. Such research, however, seldom considers whether interruptions cause a change in how information is processed. The cen...

The role of process data in the development and testing of process models of judgment and decision making

The aim of this article is to evaluate the contribution of process tracing data to the development and testing of models of judgment and decision making (JDM). We draw on our experience of editing the “Handbook of proces...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678198
  • DOI -
  • Views 160
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Karl H. Schlag and Joël J. van der Weele (2015). A method to elicit beliefs as most likely intervals. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(5), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678198