Validation and invariance across age and gender for the Melbourne Decision-Making Questionnaire in a sample of Portuguese adults

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2020, Vol 15, Issue 1

Abstract

The personal pattern of coping with the stress associated with making decisions characterizes the way an individual makes choices and judgments. The Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire (MDMQ) analyses these personal patterns and has been used across various cultures in order to assess four main strategies: vigilance, buck-passing, procrastination, and hypervigilance. We sought to adapt and validate a Portuguese version of the MDMQ. Our study was conducted with a sample of 523 Portuguese people aged 18 or older. The questionnaire retained the original four scales, which represent four different decisional patterns, showing good reliability and validity – concurrent as well as predictive – and invariance for gender and age. The coping pattern with the highest mean was vigilance, while procrastination had the lowest mean. In contrast to other studies of the MDMQ, our sample had a more diversified distribution of age. Young adults were less capable than older adults of managing stress when making decisions, due to their higher levels of buck-passing, hypervigilance, and procrastination. Vigilance showed stronger correlations to positive affect, satisfaction with life, and better decisional self-esteem, while the remaining scales were related to negative affect, reduced decisional self-esteem, and lower satisfaction with life. These decision-making styles are chosen depending on time constraints, pressure, or other contextual characteristics. These results suggest that individuals resort to more convenient patterns according to their situation, and that these patterns of decision-making can be trained, developed, and improved.

Authors and Affiliations

Luís Filipe, Maria-João Alvarez, Magda Sofia Roberto and Joaquim A. Ferreira

Keywords

Related Articles

Criteria for performance evaluation

Using a cognitive task (mental calculation) and a perceptual-motor task (stylized golf putting), we examined differential proficiency using the CWS index and several other quantitative measures of performance. The CWS in...

Genetic testing and risk interpretation: How do women understand lifetime risk results?

Genetic screening for BRCA1 and BRCA2 gives women the opportunity for early detection, surveillance, and intervention. One key feature of genetic testing and counseling is the provision of personal lifetime risk. However...

Error Parsing: An alternative method of implementing social judgment theory

We present a novel method of judgment analysis called Error Parsing, based upon an alternative method of implementing Social Judgment Theory (SJT). SJT and Error Parsing both posit the same three components of error in h...

The effects of behavioral and outcome feedback on prudent decision-making under conditions of present and future uncertainty

One of the largest reasons decision-makers make bad decisions (act imprudently) is that the world is full of uncertainty, we feel uncertain about the consequences of our actions. Participants played a repeated game in wh...

From foe to friend and back again: The temporal dynamics of intra-party bias in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election

Political identification is the basis of enduring conflict, suggesting that political attitudes are difficult to change. Here we show that in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election, political identities underwent modificati...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678463
  • DOI -
  • Views 130
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Luís Filipe, Maria-João Alvarez, Magda Sofia Roberto and Joaquim A. Ferreira (2020). Validation and invariance across age and gender for the Melbourne Decision-Making Questionnaire in a sample of Portuguese adults. Judgment and Decision Making, 15(1), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678463