Recognition-based judgments and decisions: What we have learned (so far)

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2011, Vol 6, Issue 5

Abstract

This special issue on recognition processes in inferential decision making represents an adversarial collaboration among the three guest editors. This introductory article to the special issue’s third and final part comes in three sections. In Section 1, we summarize the six papers that appear in this part. In Section 2, we give a wrap-up of the lessons learned. Specifically, we discuss (i) why studying the recognition heuristic has led to so much controversy, making it difficult to settle on mutually accepted empirically grounded assumptions, (ii) whether the development of the recognition heuristic and its theoretical descriptions could explain some of the past controversies and misconceptions, (iii) how additional cue knowledge about unrecognized objects could enter the decision process, (iv) why recognition heuristic theory should be complemented by a probabilistic model of strategy selection, and (v) how recognition information might be related to other information, especially when considering real-world applications. In Section 3, we present an outlook on the thorny but fruitful road to cumulative theory integration. Future research on recognition-based inferences should (i) converge on overcoming past controversies, taking an integrative approach to theory building, and considering theories and findings from neighboring fields (such as marketing science and artificial intelligence), (ii) build detailed computational process models of decision strategies, grounded in cognitive architectures, (iii) test existing models of such strategies competitively, (iv) design computational models of the mechanisms of strategy selection, and (v) effectively extend its scope to decision making in the wild, outside controlled laboratory situations.

Authors and Affiliations

Julian N. Marewski, Rüdiger F. Pohl and Oliver Vitouch

Keywords

Related Articles

Overconfidence over the lifespan

This research investigated how different forms of overconfidence correlate with age. Contrary to stereotypes that young people are more overconfident, the results provide little evidence that overestimation of one’s perf...

Solving stumpers, CRT and CRAT: Are the abilities related?

Bar-Hillel, Noah and Frederick (2018) studied a class of riddles they called stumpers, which have simple, but curiously elusive, solutions. A canonical example is: “Andy is Bobbie’s brother, but Bobbie is not Andy’s brot...

Hedonic “adaptation”: Specific habituation to disgust/death elicitors as a result of dissecting a cadaver

People live in a world in which they are surrounded by potential disgust elicitors such as “used” chairs, air, silverware, and money as well as excretory activities. People function in this world by ignoring most of thes...

Recalled emotions and risk judgments: Field study of the 2006 Israel-Lebanon War

The current study is based on a field study of the 2006 Israel-Lebanon war that was conducted in two waves, the first two weeks after the end of the war, and the second 18 months later (2008). The purpose of the study wa...

It’s personal: The effect of personal value on utilitarian moral judgments

We investigated whether the personal importance of objects influences utilitarian decision-making in which damaging property is necessary to produce an overall positive outcome. In Experiment 1, participants judged savin...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677824
  • DOI -
  • Views 133
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Julian N. Marewski, Rüdiger F. Pohl and Oliver Vitouch (2011). Recognition-based judgments and decisions: What we have learned (so far). Judgment and Decision Making, 6(5), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677824