It’s personal: The effect of personal value on utilitarian moral judgments
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2016, Vol 11, Issue 4
Abstract
We investigated whether the personal importance of objects influences utilitarian decision-making in which damaging property is necessary to produce an overall positive outcome. In Experiment 1, participants judged saving five objects by destroying a sixth object to be less acceptable when the action required destroying the sixth object directly (rather than as a side-effect) and the objects were personally important (rather than unimportant). In Experiment 2, we demonstrated that utilitarian judgments were not influenced by the objects’ monetary worth. Together these findings suggest that personal importance underlies people’s sensitivity to damaging property as a means for utilitarian gains.
Authors and Affiliations
Charles Millar, Christina Starmans, Jonathan Fugelsang and Ori Friedman
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP678248
- DOI -
- Views 152
- Downloads 0
The effects of mental steps and compatibility on Bayesian reasoning
Four laboratory studies were conducted to test the hypothesis that correct Bayesian reasoning can be predicted by two factors of task complexity — the number of mental steps required to reach the normative solution, and...
Response mode, compatibility, and dual-processes in the evaluation of simple gambles: An eye-tracking investigation
We employed simple gambles to investigate information processing in relation to the compatibility effect. Subjects should be more likely to engage in a deliberative thinking strategy when completing a pricing task rather...
Construal levels and moral judgment: Some complications
Eyal, T., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y., (2008). Judging near and distant virtue and vice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1204–1209, explored how psychological distance influences moral judgment and found tha...
Moral emotions as determinants of third-party punishment: Anger, guilt, and the functions of altruistic sanctions
Third-party punishment has recently received attention as an explanation for human altruism. Feelings of anger in response to norm violations are assumed to motivate third-party sanctions, yet there is only sparse and in...
Facing expectations: Those that we prefer to fulfil and those that we disregard
We argue that people choosing prosocial distribution of goods (e.g., in dictator games) make this choice because they do not want to disappoint their partner rather than because of a direct preference for the chosen pros...