Additivity dominance: Additivites are more potent and more often lexicalized across languages than are “subtractives”
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2009, Vol 4, Issue 6
Abstract
Judgments of naturalness of foods tend to be more influenced by the process history of a food, rather than its actual constituents. Two types of processing of a “natural” food are to add something or to remove something. We report in this study, based on a large random sample of individuals from six countries (France, Germany, Italy, Switzerland, UK and USA) that additives are considered defining features of what makes a food not natural, whereas “subtractives” are almost never mentioned. In support of this, skim milk (with major subtraction of fat) is rated as more natural than whole milk with a small amount of natural vitamin D added. It is also noted that “additives” is a common word, with a synonym reported by a native speaker in 17 of 18 languages, whereas “subtractive” is lexicalized in only 1 of the 18 languages. We consider reasons for additivity dominance, relating it to omission bias, feature positive bias, and notions of purity.
Authors and Affiliations
Paul Rozin, Claude Fischler, and Christy Shields-Argelès
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP677703
- DOI -
- Views 143
- Downloads 0
It’s still bullshit: Reply to Dalton (2016)
In reply to Dalton (2016), we argue that bullshit is defined in terms of how it is produced, not how it is interpreted. We agree that it can be interpreted as profound by some readers (and assumed as much in the original...
An attempt to clarify the link between cognitive style and political ideology: A non-western replication and extension
Previous studies relating low-effort or intuitive thinking to political conservatism are limited to Western cultures. Using Turkish and predominantly Muslim samples, Study 1 found that analytic cognitive style (ACS) is n...
Cultural differences in responses to real-life and hypothetical trolley problems
Trolley problems have been used in the development of moral theory and the psychological study of moral judgments and behavior. Most of this research has focused on people from the West, with implicit assumptions that mo...
Choosing victims: Human fungibility in moral decision-making
In considering moral dilemmas, people often judge the acceptability of exchanging individuals’ interests, rights, and even lives. Here we investigate the related, but often overlooked, question of how people decide who t...
Strategy selection during exploratory behavior: sex differences
This study was designed to assess sex-related differences in the selection of an appropriate strategy when facing novelty. A simple visuo-spatial task was used to investigate exploratory behavior as a specific response t...