Using the ACT-R architecture to specify 39 quantitative process models of decision making

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2011, Vol 6, Issue 6

Abstract

Hypotheses about decision processes are often formulated qualitatively and remain silent about the interplay of decision, memorial, and other cognitive processes. At the same time, existing decision models are specified at varying levels of detail, making it difficult to compare them. We provide a methodological primer on how detailed cognitive architectures such as ACT-R allow remedying these problems. To make our point, we address a controversy, namely, whether noncompensatory or compensatory processes better describe how people make decisions from the accessibility of memories. We specify 39 models of accessibility-based decision processes in ACT-R, including the noncompensatory recognition heuristic and various other popular noncompensatory and compensatory decision models. Additionally, to illustrate how such models can be tested, we conduct a model comparison, fitting the models to one experiment and letting them generalize to another. Behavioral data are best accounted for by race models. These race models embody the noncompensatory recognition heuristic and compensatory models as a race between competing processes, dissolving the dichotomy between existing decision models.

Authors and Affiliations

Julian N. Marewski and Katja Mehlhorn

Keywords

Related Articles

Repeated judgment sampling: Boundaries

This paper investigates the boundaries of the recent result that eliciting more than one estimate from the same person and averaging these can lead to accuracy gains in judgment tasks. It first examines its generality, a...

Anonymity and incentives: An investigation of techniques to reduce socially desirable responding in the Trust Game

Economic games offer a convenient approach for the study of prosocial behavior. As an advantage, they allow for straightforward implementation of different techniques to reduce socially desirable responding. We investiga...

Maximizing without difficulty: A modified maximizing scale and its correlates

This article presents several studies that replicate and extend previous research on maximizing. A modified scale for measuring individual maximizing tendency is introduced. The scale has adequate psychometric properties...

"If I look at the mass I will never act": Psychic numbing and genocide

Most people are caring and will exert great effort to rescue individual victims whose needy plight comes to their attention. These same good people, however, often become numbly indifferent to the plight of individuals w...

Public policy for thee, but not for me: Varying the grammatical person of public policy justifications influences their support

Past research has shown that people consistently believe that others are more easily manipulated by external influences than they themselves are—a phenomenon called the “third-person effect” (Davison, 1983). The present...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677831
  • DOI -
  • Views 110
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Julian N. Marewski and Katja Mehlhorn (2011). Using the ACT-R architecture to specify 39 quantitative process models of decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(6), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677831