Introducing upfront losses as well as gains decreases impatience in intertemporal choices with rewards
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2014, Vol 9, Issue 4
Abstract
People tend to prefer smaller and sooner (SS) rewards over larger and later (LL) ones even when the latter are much larger. Previous research have identified several ways to enhance people’s patience. Adding to this literature, the current paper demonstrates that introduction of upfront losses as well as gains to both SS and LL rewards can decrease people’s impatience. This effect is incompatible with both the normative exponential and descriptive hyperbolic discounting models, which agree on the additive assumption and the independence assumption. We also exculde the integration explanation which assumes subjects integrate upfront money with final rewards and make a decision with bottom line at the end. We consider several possible explanations, including the salience hypothesis, which states that introducing upfront money makes the money dimension more salient than not and thus increases the attractiveness of LL options.
Authors and Affiliations
Cheng-Ming Jiang, Feng-Pei Hu and Long-Fei Zhu
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP678130
- DOI -
- Views 149
- Downloads 0
Prospect theory, reference points, and health decisions
In preventative health decisions, such as the decision to undergo an invasive screening test or treatment, people may be deterred from selecting the test because its perceived disutility relative to not testing is greate...
MARTER: Markov True and Error Model of Drifting Parameters
This paper describes a theory of the variability of risky choice that describes empirical properties of choice data, including sequential effects and systematic violations of response independence. The Markov True and Er...
Risky Decision Making: Testing for Violations of Transitivity Predicted by an Editing Mechanism
Transitivity is the assumption that if a person prefers A to B and B to C, then that person should prefer A to C. This article explores a paradigm in which Birnbaum, Patton and Lott (1999) thought people might be systema...
DOSPERT+M: A survey of medical risk attitudes in the United States
Background: The Domain-Specific Risk Taking scale (DOSPERT) has been recommended as a tool for measuring risk attitudes in medical studies, but does not contain items specific to health care. Butler, et al. (2012) develo...
In the “I” of the storm: Shared initials increase disaster donations
People prefer their own initials to other letters, influencing preferences in many domains. The “name letter effect” (Nuttin, 1987) may not apply to negatively valenced targets if people are motivated to downplay or dist...