A note on determining the number of cues used in judgment analysis studies: The issue of type II error

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2007, Vol 2, Issue 5

Abstract

Many judgment analysis studies employ multiple regression procedures to estimate the importance of cues. Some studies test the significance of regression coefficients in order to decide whether or not specific cues are attended to by the judge or decision maker. This practice is dubious because it ignores type II error. The purposes of this note are (1) to draw attention to this issue, specifically as it appears in studies of self-insight, (2) to illustrate the problem with examples from the judgment literature, and (3) to provide a simple method for calculating post-hoc power in regression analyses in order to facilitate the reporting of type II errors when regression models are used.

Authors and Affiliations

Jason W. Beckstead

Keywords

Related Articles

Moral judgments of risky choices: A moral echoing effect

Two experiments examined moral judgments about a decision-maker’s choices when he chose a sure-thing, 400 out of 600 people will be saved, or a risk, a two-thirds probability to save everyone and a one-thirds probability...

Consumers can make decisions in as little as a third of a second

We make hundreds of decisions every day, many of them extremely quickly and without much explicit deliberation. This motivates two important open questions: What is the minimum time required to make choices with above ch...

Is saving lives your task or God’s? Religiosity, belief in god, and moral judgment

Should a Catholic hospital abort a life-threatening pregnancy or let a pregnant woman die? Should a religious employer allow his employees access to contraceptives or break with healthcare legislation? People and organiz...

Does telling white lies signal pro-social preferences?

The opportunity to tell a white lie (i.e., a lie that benefits another person) generates a moral conflict between two opposite moral dictates, one pushing towards telling the truth always and the other pushing towards he...

Recognition-based judgments and decisions: What we have learned (so far)

This special issue on recognition processes in inferential decision making represents an adversarial collaboration among the three guest editors. This introductory article to the special issue’s third and final part come...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677589
  • DOI -
  • Views 370
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Jason W. Beckstead (2007). A note on determining the number of cues used in judgment analysis studies: The issue of type II error. Judgment and Decision Making, 2(5), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677589