A note on determining the number of cues used in judgment analysis studies: The issue of type II error

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2007, Vol 2, Issue 5

Abstract

Many judgment analysis studies employ multiple regression procedures to estimate the importance of cues. Some studies test the significance of regression coefficients in order to decide whether or not specific cues are attended to by the judge or decision maker. This practice is dubious because it ignores type II error. The purposes of this note are (1) to draw attention to this issue, specifically as it appears in studies of self-insight, (2) to illustrate the problem with examples from the judgment literature, and (3) to provide a simple method for calculating post-hoc power in regression analyses in order to facilitate the reporting of type II errors when regression models are used.

Authors and Affiliations

Jason W. Beckstead

Keywords

Related Articles

“Lean not on your own understanding”: Belief that morality is founded on divine authority and non-utilitarian moral judgments

Recent research has shown that religious individuals are much more resistant to utilitarian modes of thinking than their less religious counterparts, but the reason for this is not clear. We propose that a meta-ethical b...

How should we measure Americans’ perceptions of socio-economic mobility?

Several scholars have suggested that Americans’ (distorted) beliefs about the rate of upward social mobility in the United States may affect political judgment and decision-making outcomes. In this article, we consider t...

The “organic” path to obesity? Organic claims influence calorie judgments and exercise recommendations

Labeling a food as “organic” entails a claim about its production but is silent on its calorie content. Nevertheless, people infer that organic cookies are lower in calories and can be eaten more often than conventional...

People respond to GM food with disgust more than fear: Comment on Royzman, Cusimano and Leeman (2017)

Scott, Inbar and Rozin (2016) reported an association between greater disgust sensitivity (DS) and more negative attitudes towards genetically modified (GM) food. Royzman, Cusimano and Leeman (2017) replicated this assoc...

Nudge to nobesity I: Minor changes in accessibility decrease food intake

Very small but cumulated decreases in food intake may be sufficient to erase obesity over a period of years. We examine the effect of slight changes in the accessibility of different foods in a pay-by-weight-of-food sala...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677589
  • DOI -
  • Views 387
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Jason W. Beckstead (2007). A note on determining the number of cues used in judgment analysis studies: The issue of type II error. Judgment and Decision Making, 2(5), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677589