A randomized clinical study to evaluate effect of dexamethasone with levobupivacaine in sciatic nerve block for post-operative pain relief

Journal Title: International Journal of Medical and Health Research - Year 2018, Vol 4, Issue 4

Abstract

Background: Pain is an unavoidable experience in postoperative period. If untreated or undertreated may result in increased morbidity as well as the cost because of impairment of quality of life. Aims and Objectives: To evaluate postoperative analgesic effect and safety of dexamethasone with levobupivacaine in sciatic nerve block for lower limb orthopedic surgeries. Materials and Methods: Sixty patients of ASA grade I and II undergoing lower limb orthopaedic surgeries were studied in the Department of Anaesthesiology, GR Medical College and JA Group of Hospitals, Gwalior from December 2015 to August 2017. The patients were divided into Group D (n= 30, were given 24 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine hydrochloride + 1ml (4mg) of dexamethasone), and Group C (n=30, were given 24ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine hydrochloride + 1ml of normal saline). Postoperative analgesia in terms of VAS score, time to first rescue analgesic (duration of analgesia) and side effect or complication were studied in both the group. Results: Male preponderance was noted in each group (27 in Group D, and 26 in Group C; p=0.749). Mean age of patients in Group D, and Group C was 34.67±13.55, and 38.93±12.54 years respectively (p>0.05). Mean pulse rate (min), SBP (mmHg), DBP (mmHg) and Sp02 (%) were comparable between groups (P>0.05). MAP (mmHg) was significantly high in Group C compared to Group D. Group D had VAS score of 42.83±0.99 at 12 hours and Group C had 49.46±1.132 at 8 hours (p value < 0.001). At 24 hours VAS score of group D and C were 15.67±1.309 and 15.67±1.714 respectively. One patient each in Group D and C experienced nausea and vomiting and one patient in Group C experienced postoperative shivering. Conclusion: Dexamethasone is a good alternative for post operative pain management along with Levobupivacaine hydrocholoride compared to Levobupivacaine with minimal postoperative complication.

Authors and Affiliations

Dr. Ajay Singh, Dr. Jitendra Agrawal, Dr. R akhi Mittal, Dr. Bhanu Choudhary

Keywords

Related Articles

Parsley! Mechanism as antiurolithiasis remedy

Parsley is a medicinal plant used widely in urolithiasis. The present study aimed to evaluate the antiurolithiatic effect of parsley and its mechanism. 24 rats divided into four groups: group A (negative control), group...

Antibiogram in tertiary care centre

A total 100 samples of patients with chronic suppurative otitis media (C.S.O.M.) were studied bacteriologically. Ear infection was found to be more common in paediatric population (70.96%). Males suffered more than femal...

Relationship with dietary adherence and renal dietary regimen among hemodialysis populace

‘Adherence level’ to a set regimen predicts the degree of ‘beliefs’ by an individual. Belief influences their achievement and maintenance of behavioral change in adhering to a prescribed treatment regimen. A collaborativ...

A clinical study of effects and implication of allergic rhinosinusitis

Dysfunction of the upper and lower airways frequently coexist, and they appear to share key elements of pathogenesis. Data from epidemiologic studies indicate that nasal symptoms are experienced by as many as 78% of pati...

Effect of smoking and tobacco chewing on periodontal health: A cross sectional study

Introduction: Smoking is a major etiological factor for periodontal disease. Apart from Smoking smokeless tobacco products have been in existence for thousands of years among populations in South America and Southeast As...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP585453
  • DOI -
  • Views 137
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dr. Ajay Singh, Dr. Jitendra Agrawal, Dr. R akhi Mittal, Dr. Bhanu Choudhary (2018). A randomized clinical study to evaluate effect of dexamethasone with levobupivacaine in sciatic nerve block for post-operative pain relief. International Journal of Medical and Health Research, 4(4), 88-90. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-585453