A research into ‘religionist conduct’, the conditions of its authority and the network of its conceptual relationships
Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2015, Vol 47, Issue 101
Abstract
The present paper aims to refine the conditions of authority of ‘religionist conduct’ and its position among Imamī evidences of inference. The study seeks to eliminate the shortcomings existing in former principle sources through collecting and disciplining relevant fragmented discussions. The first discussion explains the conditions of authority of religionist conduct based on a comparative approach. Here, the relationship between ‘religionist conduct’ and ‘rationalist conduct’ is measured in terms of their reasoning. The second discussion, however, tends to establish the position of ‘religionist conduct’ among other types of reasoning. Here, the authors discuss the relationship between ‘religionist conduct’ and similar established threads such as ‘tradition’, ‘consensus’ and ‘subjective speculation’ (irtikāz), and examine its reasoning position. Among the achievements of this research the following can be listed: the stipulation of the legislator’s agreeing position in terms of the authority of ‘religionist conduct’ and its consideration under narrative and practical tradition (of the Infallibles), the reasoning priority of ‘religionist conduct’ as compared with ‘consensus’, the objective analysis of ‘religionist subjective speculation’ based on ‘religionist conduct’ and its superiority in terms of authority.
Authors and Affiliations
Zahra Sadat Ahmadi Soleimani, Mohammad Taghi Fakhlaee, Mohammad Hasan Haeri
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP190126
- DOI 10.22067/fiqh.v47i21.26619
- Views 79
- Downloads 0
Replacement of certitude as to subject by authorized conjectural proof (amara)
Although Mohaghegh Khorasani has raised the impossibility of replacement of certitude as to subject by authorized conjectural proof (amara) due to the impediment of conjunction in consideration; Sheikh Ansari, while reje...
Collective beneficence (collective good) an its role in civil liability
Beneficence as a principle is one of the definite jurisprudential rules and a disclaimer of civil liability of the individual in terms of the loss enforced upon others during acts of collective good. This shall necessita...
Examination of the Concept of Ta‘līl (Causal Inference)
What is meant by ta‘līl is that if in a reason the cause of the judgment has been mentioned, the denial of the judgment can been concluded from the lack of that judgment; in such a way that from the denial of restriction...
The Basis and Realm of the Damage Surplus to Blood Money
After the victory of the Islamic Revolution and the attempts of the Islamic Republic’s officials to legalize the Islamic juridical institutions, some issues were set forth that were unprecedented in jurisprudence. To res...
A Research on the Criterion for Investigation about the Justice of the Anonymous
One of the most important legal issues debated among the jurists is whether it is necessary or unnecessary to investigate the justice of the anonymous and to what extent. The renowned majority of the jurists maintain tha...