Internet panderism from the perspective of Islamic jurisprudence

Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2016, Vol 48, Issue 106

Abstract

Internet panderism, in today’s society, is a crime which, due to technological advances, has spread significantly and perhaps, in comparison to traditional panderism, it causes far more losses. Since it is unprecedented, the ruling of internet panderism has not been considered even by contemporary Islamic jurists. After mentioning some examples of internet panderism and a detailed review, the authors have relied on arguments such as the conduct of wise and basis emendation to prove that internet panderism is a crime. They have, finally, invoked the absoluteness of Abd Alla Ibn Sanan tradition and basis emendation and concluded that since the requirements of panderism with prescribed punishment (haddi panderism) are satisfied in such panderism, internet procurers will be punished by prescribed punishment (had) of panderism, if they bring individuals together with the intention that they commit illegitimate acts of adultery and sodomy.

Authors and Affiliations

Ali Akbar Izadifard, Seyed Mojtaba Hossein Nejad

Keywords

Related Articles

Analysis of the Legal Decree of Allowance and Determination

If, in special circumstances, a decree that had already not been permissible becomes permissible due to facilitation for the religiously accountable (mukallif), that legal decree is called allowance (rukhṣat), such as th...

A new Attitude in Criticism of the Validity of Reliable Tradition

One of the most important discourses on basics of jurisprudence methodology (‘ilm al-uṣūl) is the one concerning the isolated tradition. The most important reason for proving the validity of the isolated tradition accord...

A Juridical-Legal Inquiry into ‘Aḍl in the Marriage of the Grown-up Virgin

To prevent the consequences of inexperience and prevalence of fervor resulting from emotions and sentiments in a young girl who is unfamiliar with marital affairs, the legislator has deemed as necessary the permission [f...

Legal-Juridical Study of Conditional Option in Unilateral Obligation

In civil law, khiyārāt (options or rights of withdrawal) is a topic concerning contracts. Also, in article 456 of civil law, khiyār is viewed as related to transactions. In statuary jurisprudence and law, there is little...

Analysis of the Realm and Domain of the “Rule of Authority” Regarding the Human’s Authority over His Body Organs

With regard to the evidences of the rule, what is inferred from the Qur’an and the Tradition (sunna) about the matter of authority over possessions, is the impermissibility of other’s invasion of human self, which is tot...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP190828
  • DOI 10.22067/fiqh.v0i0.37289
  • Views 82
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ali Akbar Izadifard, Seyed Mojtaba Hossein Nejad (2016). Internet panderism from the perspective of Islamic jurisprudence. فقه و اصول, 48(106), 9-25. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-190828