A Research into the Legal and Judicial Principles of the Executed Person Coming Back to Life

Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2017, Vol 48, Issue 107

Abstract

Article 438 of the Islamic penal law considers as renewable the sentence of the executed person coming back to life in case of qiṣāṣ (retaliated punishment) due to observance of the resemblance (mumāthilat) condition and in case demanded by the claimant of blood, but it has kept silent concerning the legal and discretionary punishments like those administered for drugs crimes. The present article, while presenting the viewpoints and critical review of the arguments of the proponents and opponents of renewal of death warrant, tries to answer the main question brought up in this discussion as to whether or not according to the legislator there is a difference between capital punishment, which is regularly intended as death or loss of life, and the concept of disclaiming of life or death. Finally the chosen view will be that in case we believe that execution, like crucifixion (ṣalb), is typical (qasīm) of murder and the typical of an object cannot be the very object itself, then the above-mentioned verdict can be generalized to execution and suspend the re- execution verdict in legal punishments and penalties, except in premeditated instances.

Authors and Affiliations

Alireza Abedi Sarasia, Samaneh Alavi

Keywords

Related Articles

Intellect and its Application in Fayḍ Kāshānī’s Jurisprudential Thought

Given the importance of intellect in inference, especially in new issues, it is befitting to study the jurists’ works, such as examining the jurisprudential mode of life (sīra) of Fayḍ Kāshānī as an influential jurist in...

Examining the Legal Principles of the Ruling on the Retaliated Punishment (Qiṣāṣ) of Mother for Murdering her Child

Murder is among the most abominable human acts and the most criminal behavior of mankind; in Shī’a jurisprudence, punishment for deliberate murder is qiṣāṣ (retaliated punishment) in general. On the basis of this general...

Reflections on competence of “priority of preventing an evil over securing a benefit” as a rule

“Preventing an evil takes priority over securing an interest” and preferring the prohibition side is among discussions raised by Usuli scholars and has been accepted as particular affirmative proposition; the said priori...

Allusion of Words to Meaning from the Viewpoint of legal Theorists and Linguistics

Language consists of two components of word (lafẓ) and “meaning” and the consolidated relation between word and meaning causes human mind to be transferred from the notion of lafẓ to the notion of “meaning”. The nature,...

An Approach to the Traditions on Taḥlīl and Negation of Liability to Khums Prior to Shī‘a Ownership

The principle of taḥlīl (making lawful) of khums is, in brief, indisputable. The ruling for taḥlīl of khums is issued by most of the Imams (A.S.). The object (muta‘allaq) of taḥlīl has been the same with all Imams (A.S.)...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP191160
  • DOI 10.22067/fiqh.v48i27.42507
  • Views 123
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Alireza Abedi Sarasia, Samaneh Alavi (2017). A Research into the Legal and Judicial Principles of the Executed Person Coming Back to Life. فقه و اصول, 48(107), 65-86. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-191160