Reflections on competence of “priority of preventing an evil over securing a benefit” as a rule
Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2016, Vol 48, Issue 106
Abstract
“Preventing an evil takes priority over securing an interest” and preferring the prohibition side is among discussions raised by Usuli scholars and has been accepted as particular affirmative proposition; the said priority is known among Islamic jurisprudents as “ preventing an evil takes priority over securing a benefit” in whose … is the contrast of evil and benefit. Four interpretations of the said priority may be analyzed, the fourth of which i.e. the contrast of benefit and evil, despite being ignored by Islamic jurisprudents, is qualified to be regulated. Furthermore, in the author’s eyes, the first interpretation of this priority deducted from the rule of reason is also qualified to regulated provided the four following elements are present: type of duty, type of obligation, quantity and quality of probability.
Authors and Affiliations
Mirza Mohammad Vaezi
The Basis for Civil Responsibility or Liability Resulting from the Failure to Fulfill a Commitment
Civil responsibility, meaning to undertake to compensate the damage, is divided into two types of conventional and natural responsibility. The difference of these two lies in the existence of a conventional relation betw...
The liability of kinship group (‘Aqilah) in a different perspective
Reputable Imami jurisprudents believe that liability for involuntary manslaughter (wergild or diyah) is incumbent upon the institution called ‘Āqilah (paternal kinship group of the criminal). From the very beginning, the...
Reciprocal duties and rights of owner and usurper after delivering the alternate of usurped property
Alternate of the usurped property is a compensation paid to the owner after unavailability of usurped property. The Iranian Civil Code, following the Islamic scholars' famous view, has principally accepted the payment of...
Typology of Taqrīr (Tacit Approval) in Jurisprudence of Schools
The Infallible’s (A.S.) taqrīr, as one of the three tradition types, is that an action is carried out in their presence, and although they can hinder it, they would adopt a position that would denote their consent. There...
Non-Stipulation of Security from Loss in Commanding Right and Forbidding Wrong
In legal works, the obligatoriness of commanding right and forbidding wrong has become restricted to stipulatory realization including “security against loss”. The jurists believe that commanding right and forbidding wro...