Non-Stipulation of Security from Loss in Commanding Right and Forbidding Wrong
Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2017, Vol 49, Issue 108
Abstract
In legal works, the obligatoriness of commanding right and forbidding wrong has become restricted to stipulatory realization including “security against loss”. The jurists believe that commanding right and forbidding wrong has “a suspended and conditional obligatoriness” toward the stipulation of security from loss in such a way that when a depravity or loss follows commanding right and forbidding wrong, this obligatoriness does not have actuality and is voided. Having re-examined the issue, the writers consider the evidences of the generally accepted view as violable despite its enjoyment of “great publicity”. Briefly put, the writers believe that commanding right and forbidding wrong as a legal obligation has “an absolute and non-suspended obligatoriness” toward qualified condition.
Authors and Affiliations
Muhammad Mohseni Dehkalani, Ali Akbar Izadifard, Saleh Montazari
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP191168
- DOI 10.22067/jfu.v0i0.37732
- Views 101
- Downloads 0
Stoning (Rajm) in the Critiques’ Criterion “A Deliberation on the Theory of Negating the Legitimacy of Stoning in terms of Confirmation and Verification”
There is no doubt that expressing new ideas, exchange of opinions, and criticism of the scholars’ ideas are among the scholarly traditions that are influential in purification as well as dynamic and sublime development o...
A Rereading of the Jurisprudential Precept for Participation at the Dissidents’ Communal Prayers and Following Their Leadership with a Special Regard to Imam Khomein’s Viewpoint
A considerable part of the statements in different Shi’ite jurisprudential chapters expresses the practical obligations of the obliged (mukallafīn) with respect to the denominational dissidents. The concept of denominati...
A Deliberation on the Deprivation of Couples from Right to Qiṣāṣ
In the Islamic penal system, a right to retaliate called "right to qiṣāṣ" is established for the relatives of someone who has been murdered deliberately. However, the couples have been excluded from among the relatives o...
Lapse of Qiṣāṣ Punishment due to Taking Possession of the Right to Qiṣāṣ
Despite accepting the "principle of qiṣāṣ (retaliated punishment)" in the crimes against the physical entirety of people, the Islamic Legal System has stressed the preference of forgiveness and considered it as having pr...
A new Attitude in Criticism of the Validity of Reliable Tradition
One of the most important discourses on basics of jurisprudence methodology (‘ilm al-uṣūl) is the one concerning the isolated tradition. The most important reason for proving the validity of the isolated tradition accord...