The Basis for Civil Responsibility or Liability Resulting from the Failure to Fulfill a Commitment

Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2009, Vol 41, Issue 82

Abstract

Civil responsibility, meaning to undertake to compensate the damage, is divided into two types of conventional and natural responsibility. The difference of these two lies in the existence of a conventional relation between the two sides before infliction of damage. That the above-mentioned difference becomes the origin for a dramatic difference in the basis and outcomes of the two types of responsibility is controversial among the jurists. The well-known view considers the origin of conventional responsibility to be the explicit or implicit intention of the two sides of convention and the origin of natural responsibility to be the ruling ordained by the legislator. This difference makes the domain of responsibility in the conventional responsibility subject to the intention of the two, enabling them to expand or restrict the extent of their commitment to the compensation of damage in case of violating the law. The more recent view denies this difference and considers other differences as peripheral. The present article highlights the first viewpoint and the author believes that since the origin of conventional responsibility is the intention of the two sides, they can assume the responsibility to be bigger or smaller that what is asserted in rules and that this agreement is not against the imperative rulings of the law-maker or the legislator.

Authors and Affiliations

Sayyid ḤAsan Vahdatī Shubayrī

Keywords

Related Articles

An Introduction to Reliance on the Holy Qur’ān in Methodogy of Islamic Principles

Methodology of Islamic principles (‘ilm al-uṣūl) is a dignified science serving to understand religious texts; on the other hand, however, this science is indebted to Holy Qur’ān for its credibility and authority. The Qu...

Internal Legal Alms (Zakāt) from Jurisprudential Point of View

Financial assistance to the needy is among the approaches for achieving economic justice and fighting against poverty. This research hypothesizes that in addition to the commonly known zakāt and khums, there is another f...

A Legal-Judicial Deliberation on the Article 575 of the Civil Law

Although in principle the benefit and loss resulted from partnership is to be taken into consideration in private relationships proportionate to the parties’ shares, prediction of stipulating more benefit or exempting al...

Legal Status of the Contract Containing Illegitimate Subject in Imāmī Jurisprudence

There is disagreement among the Imāmī jurisprudences concerning the legal status of contract containing illegitimate subject; although some maintain the soundness of such contract, most jurists believe in the invalidity...

The Principle of “Obligation for Dignifying Human Being” in Islamic Jurisprudence and Law

The inherent dignity is a Divine bounty from God to Man and since it is inherent and intrinsic in human nature, its dispossession is not possible. According to some of the noble verses of the Qur’ān, human dignity can be...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP183003
  • DOI 10.22067/fiqh.v0i0.3152
  • Views 117
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Sayyid ḤAsan Vahdatī Shubayrī (2009). The Basis for Civil Responsibility or Liability Resulting from the Failure to Fulfill a Commitment. فقه و اصول, 41(82), 169-204. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-183003