A Teleological Interpretation of the Applicability of Rhetoric in the Peripatetic Tradition

Journal Title: Studia Gilsoniana - Year 2018, Vol 7, Issue 2

Abstract

For Aristotle, the classification of the audience is the basis of distinguishing the main genres of rhetoric. Due to the auditor receiving political, judicial or educational content, there is a distinction into deliberative, judicial, and epideictic rhetoric. There are three more specific ends of rhetoric connected with the three basic types of auditors. Due to the communicative character of rhetoric, these ends are achieved against the background of the relation to the subject of the speech, referring to the decisions made by the auditor. Deliberative rhetoric is speech or writing that attempts to persuade an audience to take (or not to take) some action. The specific end of this rhetorical genre is good. Judicial rhetoric is speech or writing that considers the justice or injustice of a certain charge or accusation. Epideictic rhetoric is speech or writing that praises (encomium) or blames (invective). Persuasion in rhetoric happens because of a specific end: goodness, justice, nobility. Thus, the specific nature of the end of persuasion is taken into account. Perceiving the end against the background of the subject of persuasion allows one to develop a method. The method that determines the applicability of rhetoric occurs in the tradition of peripatetic rhetoric in a non-autonomous way, but is closely related to the end and to the subject of speech.

Authors and Affiliations

Maria Joanna Gondek

Keywords

Related Articles

ON “THE CONTINGENCY OF OUR OWN BEATITUDE.” SOME REFLECTIONS ON GILSON’S “THE FUTURE OF AUGUSTINIAN METAPHYSICS”

Inspired by selected passages from Wendell Berry’s story “A Place in Time,” the article discusses Étienne Gilson’s essay “The Future of Augus-tinian Metaphysics.” Augustinian metaphysics, according to Gilson, begins with...

E-BOOK: Studia Gilsoniana 7, no. 1 (2018)

Maria Asuncion L. Magsino: Peirce, Sebeok, and the Semiotic Reformation on Contemporary Communications ● Claudio Marenghi: La originalidad de la ontología tomista y su giro en torno al ser ● Peter A. Redpath: Why Augusti...

MARITAIN AND AQUINAS ON OUR DISCOVERY OF BEING

The author presents and compares Maritain’s and Aquinas’s accounts of our discovery (1) of being as existing; and (2) of being as being (ens inquantum ens or the subject of metaphysics). He finds that especially in his f...

Silence and the Audibility of the Word: Contemplative Listening as a Fundamental Act of the New Evangelization. Part 3: Christ Reveals Man to Himself on Calvary

In the third part of her arguing for contemplative listening as a fundamental act of the new evangelization, the author shows that the concrete place where the anthropological and theological dimensions of listening conv...

To See a City Come into Being in Speech: Genus and Analogy in Plato’s Republic

An understanding of the philosophical genus contributes to the perfection of the act of the philosophical habit of the human soul because reality is constituted by a multitude of overlapping genera. Because genera are co...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP298928
  • DOI 10.26385/SG.070209
  • Views 147
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Maria Joanna Gondek (2018). A Teleological Interpretation of the Applicability of Rhetoric in the Peripatetic Tradition. Studia Gilsoniana, 7(2), 181-199. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-298928