A Three Month Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Different Surface Treatment Agents on the Surface Integrity and Softness of Acrylic based Soft Liner: An In vivo Study

Journal Title: Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research - Year 2017, Vol 11, Issue 9

Abstract

Introduction: Acrylic based soft liners are cost effective, yet are inferior in durability as compared to silicone based liners. Hence, this study was conducted to evaluate if the softness and surface integrity of acrylic based soft liner can be maintained by using different surface treatment agents. Aim: To comparatively evaluate the effects of Varnish, Monopoly and Kregard surface treatment agents on the surface integrity and softness of acrylic based soft liner at baseline, at one month and after three months. Materials and Methods: A total of 37 participants who required conventional maxillary dentures were selected according to the determined inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study. In the maxillary denture on the denture bearing surface, eight palatal recesses (5 mm x 3 mm) were made and filled with acrylic based soft liner (Permasoft). The soft liners in these recesses were given surface treatment and divided as control (uncoated), Varnish, Monopoly and Kregard groups. The hardness and surface integrity were evaluated with Shore A Durometer and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) respectively at baseline, one month and three months interval. Surface integrity between groups was compared using Kruskal-Wallis test. Intergroup comparison for hardness was done using ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD post-hoc tests. Results: Amongst all the groups tested, surface integrity was maintained in the Kregard group, as compared to control, Varnish and Monopoly groups for all three time intervals (p< 0.001). Kregard treated samples also demonstrated significantly higher softness at all the time intervals (p<0.001). Conclusion: Surface treatment with Kregard demonstrated better surface integrity and softness at all the time intervals.

Authors and Affiliations

Harekrishna Jayendra Raval, Neerja Mahajan, Y. G. Naveen, Rajesh Sethuraman

Keywords

Related Articles

Diabetic Dyslipidemia: Current Concepts in Pathophysiology and Management

ABSTRACT Diabetes Mellitus (DM) has assumed pandemic proportions worldwide. The increase in prevalence of this non-communicable disease has been quite alarming. South East Asia is home to approximately 71.4 million of th...

Improved Outcome with Gefitinib in Recurrent Middle Ear Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Middle ear and external ear malignancies are rare. There is lack of consensus in managing such cases. Surgery followed by radiotherapy is the best option for advanced cancers, while radiotherapy alone in radical doses is...

Are Indian Peacekeepers on Path to Mental Peace?

ABSTRACT Introduction: There is paucity of literature on mental morbidity of United Nations (UN) peace keeping soldiers. Peacekeeping mission implies overseas deployment, hostile and harsh conditions, armed conflict and...

Evaluation of the Nature of Thyroid Nodules by Duplex Ultrasound and Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of TIRADS Classification

Introduction: Ultrasound (US) is the primary modality used to assess the thyroid glands. However, the terminology used by the radiologist is not easy for clinicians to understand. Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Syste...

Hypoplastic and Accessory Radial Arteries: A Case Report

ABSTRACT Arterial variations in the upper extremity occur in a high prevalence. The radial artery is a terminal branch of the brachial artery in the cubital fossa. This artery is used in some treatment interventions and...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP363834
  • DOI 10.7860/JCDR/2017/28604.10680
  • Views 30
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Harekrishna Jayendra Raval, Neerja Mahajan, Y. G. Naveen, Rajesh Sethuraman (2017). A Three Month Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Different Surface Treatment Agents on the Surface Integrity and Softness of Acrylic based Soft Liner: An In vivo Study. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 11(9), 88-91. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-363834